(March 5, 2018 at 2:22 am)robvalue Wrote:
(March 4, 2018 at 10:07 am)AtlasS33 Wrote: I would point my sight at the [1) results 2) conditions] if I want to compare experiences.
An experience is nothing but the amount of time you spent at doing something.
-If I analyze the results alone; then I'm judging the quality of the experience (or time spent doing that thing in question).
-If I analyze the conditions alone; then I'm judging the justification of the experience's quality.
As for zombies; they can't generate proper results because the conditions fail them every time; but they are the cause of this failure. In other words; they corrupt their own minds by their own hands.
We are all equal; but the conditions around the experience's generation lead to different results, one of the results is the doomed zombie state.
If you have a zombie and a non-zombie in front of you, how do you tell which is which? To know that "corruption" has gone on, you'd have to know how a person is supposed to be acting before the corruption.
I would look at the results of their logic. The question for me is "in which context" should I judge that the result is complete or not?
Is death the end, or is the continues advent of generations is the context; i.e a never ending context?
Are we living a result inflicted by the past generations? That means that the conditions are not so alien to the results.
But to answer you; a zombie is that person producing the wrong results. I need to observe the results of their actions first, then decide.