My proofs for Islam

[Mystic]

What is meant in the 2nd premise has to be exactly what is meant in the first premise by illusion or else the argument is non-sequitur.  Of course, I've elaborated this argument in detail in the past, and so I just wanted to summarize it to show it is a valid argument. The two premises have been discussed many times.

As Gae Bolga said, what you are saying is, essentially:

if God doesn't exist, we don't exist.  We do exist, therefore god. 
Let me ask you this, Why does our existence necessitate the existence of God, in your belief?

Absolute perception is the only thing that can see our true accurate reality and if we don't have that, we have nothing to work with to estimate or come near to in accuracy in valuing, and I will elaborate this more as I go through other arguments for God.  I don't agree with how Gae Bolga summarized my argument though.