In support of the rage of man

[Athene]

---

For the last time, not letting someone go requires an act of MORE than merely standing in a doorway and saying "No, I'm still talking." 

Unless perhaps, said person is massive enough to block the entire width of the doorway AND there are no other means of exit in the entire house except for that one goddamned door. 
Then you'd probably have a case.

Telling someone that they can't leave because you are still talking is aggression. You are blocking their right to walk away, and you are asserting a right to continue making them angry.

It can be aggression. It can also be an act of fear, pleading, desperation, or simply wanting to finish making point with no intent on forcibly detaining anyone AND both parties being aware of that. 
You already know this of course, but you insist on being a knucklehead about it because you're pissed that you're just now figuring out that it's not against the law.

So ridiculous.
As if it's my fault you didn't look it up before you ran your mouth.

You need to check your privilege.

Uh-oh...Oh, no he didn't!

Lol...You know that when angry guys such as yourself toss that phrase around people just laugh at you, right?
It only makes bombs go off in the brains of folks like you. 

LMFAO