1. Arbitrarily high Intelligence does not automatically or inevitably lead to sentience. Sentience as we know it seems to be the result of a particular set of neurological circuitry developed not for any specific evolutionary need, but as an property that emerged from that particular ways in which a host of evolutionary needs are met. It is altogether unclear to me how many different fundamental ways there can be for intelligence to emerge. But it seems to me arbitrary improvements to processing speeds Nd problem solving capacity does not lead in the right general direction of what we call sentience.
2. Ethics is ultimately a lie and a compromise designed to sell a general necessity to those who do not perceive the necessity or do not personally benefit form it. What is the necessity for giving arbitrarily high artificial intelligence some semblance of personhood?
2. Ethics is ultimately a lie and a compromise designed to sell a general necessity to those who do not perceive the necessity or do not personally benefit form it. What is the necessity for giving arbitrarily high artificial intelligence some semblance of personhood?
