Saturated Fat Controversy

[Abaddon_ire]

Yeah, you now realize you were wrong when you said Nina Teicholz was probably right about nutrition, so you simply change the topic. I’ve made this thread specifically about the saturated fat controversy, to see if there are indeed convincing arguments against saturated fat leading to heart disease… and it seems to me more and more that there aren’t.

Sure. There are. But those are based on science and research. You are stuck in a religion. The same religion as Nina. You have simply tossed the religion you were raised in and substituted a new one to fill the vacuum that you foolishly thought needed filling. Hint: That gap is false and need no filling at all.

All we have here is you swapping one religion for the next one. It happens to be veganism for you. It could as well have been "last Thursdayism". It would not matter. You have simply swapped one religion for whichever next religion seemed most popular to you at the time. 

When veganism falls out of favour, you will glom onto something else. Chakras, or auras, or some other idiotic belief system. And then you will gullibly swallow whatever those gurus feed you. And you will repeat that cycle until it finally dawns on you that all of it is BS. That realisation is not something that I or anyone else can gift to you. There is no way but the hard way. Good lick.

---

Is it someone else's problem that you're not interested in an answer to the question you asked?

Go do your own homework, or honestly, don't.  No one cares.  It won't be hard, I know this, because I had to look up Nina Teicholz.  The info you want is right there, no digging required, it's how I know you never did any research of your own.

I've done plenty of research on my own. I've made this compiler before entering the university, having researched everything needed for it by myself. And the same goes for the PacMan game I've made, I haven't even modified it after entering the university: I've researched that all by myself, alongside attending a boring grammar school.
It's not hard to find people positively reviewing Nina Teicholz'es work, but I'm having trouble finding an actual nutritionist reviewing it.

Nope. That is not a compiler in any way shape or form. I have taught assembler in various flavours to various classes and I know for a fact you are hurling bovine fecal matter.

PSA: All of these claims are false. 

Nobody should buy into this. FA is lying.

At best, FA has used some development tools that give results on an abstraction layer that is so far removed so as to be useless. Effectively, what FA is claiming is that he programmed a tic-tac-toe game on the intertubes and therefore he is qualified to run a Cray II which he has stored under his bed in mom's place.

Well fuck that. To this day, I continue to write encryption routines in assembler and in machine code. So that claim is out the window straight away.

Second, my code securely processes credit card transactions. Might even be yours for all I know. 
The level of security and data protection is scary. 

Nevertheless, FA seems blissfully unaware of any of it because who knows what might be happening in his strange head? 

I don't. Nobody here can.

All I can do is point out that this is an area of expertise for me, and everything FA has claimed is flat out wrong.