(December 10, 2019 at 6:30 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:Quote:I reject the Hadith for this exact reason: so the bold "but" would be obsolete. It is obsolete against the Quran alone without other books that twist its cause and message.
I'm delighted that you reject the Hadith, but it's immaterial, innit, because YOU aren't the one stoning adulterers and blasphemers. There are at least ten Muslim majority countries where stoning is carried out, to a greater or lesser extent. The fact that some (possibly a majority) of these stonings are extrajudicial is beside the point. Stoning is deeply ingrained in Islamic culture.
Boru
I believe that simplicity is the way to solve anything. Across the Quran stoning does not exist as a sentence, so if a person wanted to stone his wife because the Quran said so then he is:
1-A liar claiming the existence of verses that don't exist
2-The Hadith is an obsolete since it's the word of man that came 200 years after the Quran
I doubt that it is practiced as a law; even Saudi Arabia stopped it, you have to list the countries that do it, we only saw it returning in Syria with ISIS.
I insist that you see the amounts of Muslims on xhamster and twitter who post nudes of themselves..yes; pornhub too.
But the last sentence is true, it has roots as deep as the Hadith's roots because that is its source