Agnosticism IS the most dishonest position

[The Grand Nudger]

I'm obviously not hearing anything that I want to hear...what with what I'm hearing being the reason I couldn't be a member of your club.  I really don't need a stronger case for why I do or don't join any club. 

Your club says things I can't co-sign, therefore I'm not interested in being in your club.  This can't be hard to understand. 

You do need a stronger case when you call someone whose even sleep position is imitated by millions of people, a child molester. But you didn't go further than simple name calling when asked about a justification.

I really don't....but that's a wonderfully strange detail to add.  So what if millions of people wanna sleep like Mo?  I don't.  

I'm the judge and jury over whether or not I can join a club, and why, Kloro.  Your founder was evil and your religion is morally abhorrent.  Not objective enough?  What would be, you tell me. 

How is calling someone evil and walking away objective? Define evil within your moral system. That's a very difficult challenge already, I think.

Not really, and..ultimately, it doesn't matter how evil is defined in my system.   I'm only telling you that because, in my system, your cult founder and your religion are evil...I...a person of good moral character, am not and cannot be interested in joining your club.  Like I said, an unwinnable soul.  It's worth thinking about if you make a habit of arguing with atheists or proselytizing for your faith.

Proving the existence of your god..which you cannot do, and even the actual existence of your god..risible...wouldn't be enough to convert someone to islam.  All of your work would still be ahead of you.