Agnosticism IS the most dishonest position

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

And how does "billions of years" invalidate the argument? Do you think of the physical constants as some socks in your attic?

It's actually the other way around, the more time there is for things to go wrong, the more unlikely it becomes for life to arise.


Well, "destroyed" is your side of the story.

Life emerged after by bilions of years those constants of the universe were in place. Life was tuned by these constants, not the other way around. And tuned by death of those beings that had bad genetic traits whyle others that did, thrived and reproduced.

And yes, there is a vast amount of evidence for evolution. It is a fact an undeniable truth. Those like you that deny it, do it from ignorance and worse, for religious motivations as I stand witness. Do yourself a favour and read other books, even experiment what they teach. You can try peas, easy to study even a monk can do it. Reading your favourite religious books and drivel just do... nothing, except perhaps upping your DK effect and personal pride.

I have nothing else to say to you, you would require proper education and a few years studying many books, not just one, to know what you are talking about.

[Bold mine]

Exactly.  Invoking magic to explain why humans evolved on Earth is akin to walking into a clothing shop and being amazed at all the coats.

Boru