(April 6, 2020 at 1:26 pm)Agnostico Wrote:arewethereyet Wrote:Tell us how your views would be different, if they would be, if the age group most vulnerable was 20-49.Quote:Are you going to demand the sacrifice of their lives for those older and younger?
If the deaths were of people between 20-40yo then i would say the same thing, those people remain home. If the ages were 0-20, same thing, stay home
No where did i demand the death of anyone, in fact i specifically said i don't want anyone to die
(April 6, 2020 at 4:50 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: No one has used an ad hominem. Let me explain:
An ad hominem would be the claim that your arguments are invalid because of you, as in, 'The idea that people should be allowed to die for purely economic reasons is wrong because Agnostico is a cunt.'
What's happened in this thread is that people are calling you a cunt because of your arguments. Quite a difference.
Boru
I never said people should be allowed to die for economic reasons. Not once did I use the word economy.
This is the definition of ad hominem on google
adjective: (of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining
Posts that are calling me this or that without addressing any of my points are ad hominem. Its attacking the man instead of the argument.
Points that no one addressed is the fact that less than 40 people have died here in Australia, u know. Not thousands or hundreds, just 40
I mentioned the government plans 6 months of this
I mentioned that people will become homeless and have to battle and live it tough on the streets for the rest of their lives
Another point i made is that more lives are likely to end if we have this 6 month lock down
I never said to drop all restrictions and reopen it all like it was
Instead im saying some businesses can start re opening under the same conditions which Taiwan used
The methods used by eastern countries like Taiwan to keep their death ratio so low
Another major point is all the country area, far from the cities that remain unaffected.
I mentioned that this is unprecedented and options need to be discussed
Then i linked three different reputable media programs from here in Australia talking about it with experts, giving a lot more lines of reasoning than i gave
No one bothered to address any of it. None of the points i made and none of the points the analysts made either
If some one disagrees then make a case or at least refer to one of the points
At the very least answer this;
When can we (Australians) start re opening some industries?
Is it when the death ratio gets down to 1 per day (which is what Australia is at). Is it when the death ratio is at 1 per week?
What's your measure of when people can start getting back to work?
The low figures in Australia means that there is a discussion about it here
In America and many European countries the death toll is way too high to be talking about this yet. Maybe that why people getting triggered
Try imagine your country down the track when the death ratio drops to one per day, full nation locked down, when should restrictions start getting lifted?
It's a serious question that every country will eventually have to answer, when can people start living again?
It has to happen eventually, when?
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM