(July 13, 2020 at 10:11 am)WinterHold Wrote:(July 13, 2020 at 5:59 am)Aoi Magi Wrote: Well, I guess that's a good first step, but making laws and actually enacting them are two separate ballgames.
I want to refer to the gullibility of people who consider this crap an evidence of "progression". Sudan has tons over tons of problems that include wars, tribal wars and even a civil war, water problems -as I showed in the previous post-, and etc, so talking about an alcohol law does seem like nothing more than an attempt to milk the western public opinion. I mean feed your people first and stop the civil/tribal wars.
So any person buying this is either ignorant concerning politics and the state of Sudan, or plain simply gullible.
i.e this is a mere old tactic to milk western public opinion.
(July 13, 2020 at 10:05 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: Yes, I do. Would not changing the law have gotten them more water? No. Will changing the law get them more trade and tourism? Yes.
I see this kind of argument often: Why are we accepting refugees when we have homeless veterans? Why reform police when the black murder rate is so high? Why do anything if someone, somewhere, has a bigger problem?
Tourism ? I hope the tourists don't get kidnapped first.
You realize that the last time people protested in Sudan they got shot, right?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khartoum_massacre
Quote:Deaths
128+[1]
Perpetrators
Rapid Support Forces (RSF),[4] Janjaweed militias[3] and TMC security forces[3]
? so ain't speaking about an alcohol law lame? I mean Sudanese people are getting shot at sight when they protest !
Starvation, water shortages, attacks on protestors, wars and tourist kidnappings have NOTHING to do with the OP.
Stop trolling.
Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
