RE: Raising the minimum wage won't help
June 9, 2021 at 5:47 pm
(This post was last modified: June 9, 2021 at 5:48 pm by mascale.)
Better to start with a mass media concept. Money is arithmetic, valued in transactions. If one third of the economy can't do transactions--on which upper incomes rely--then there are no upper incomes of any value. Effectively, they to to skyrocketed-levels. Warren Buffet has the money, but not the Lamborghini. As a world-wide phenomenon--that puts Lamborghini out of business.
When transactions can happen, then a market-place happens. The value of the labor is better thought to proceed from the abilities to create transactions. Jesus ben Joseph, Son of Mary, called, "OH Christ," (mostly in English), raises the matter in a likely scripted fable--mostly appearing in only one likely scripted gospel. One-third of the fabled(?) get cast out to the predators, (Matt 25: 14-30). The buried Talent never makes it to any market-place. The sense of market-place transactions, in fact, is completely superseded. There are none in the fable. The one Talent even gets sky-rocketed--insofar as there is any such capability in that timeframe. Baby Abandonment was known in that timeframe. Medieval Romans would toss babies into the Tiber River. Now Indiana is host to drop-off boxes. Red-States have their values, with basis-certain.
Some Hispanics are themselves less interested in a Minimum Wage raise, than they are in a Family Assistance plan. The transactions are more valuable than the wage--likely insufficient. Other than China, assistance and rules regarding assistance for newer families is not a policy, in any culture, anywhere. "Households" are not valued.
Anyone compares the Amendment Two crazies--gun supportive--and the Jan 6 Capitol Building insurgency. Is any militia anywhere better-served with entire arsenals in common use among insurgents? Are militias better served with armaments restrictions? People--Republicans, loosely speaking--are on board with more armaments, even applied in common practice.
The Hispanic contention would be said the more rational. The Jan 6 insurgency offered no transactions. Some participants were armed.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Lives Don't Matter: Especially Kneeling, at prayers(?), in Minnesota, (Amendment One(?)!)
When transactions can happen, then a market-place happens. The value of the labor is better thought to proceed from the abilities to create transactions. Jesus ben Joseph, Son of Mary, called, "OH Christ," (mostly in English), raises the matter in a likely scripted fable--mostly appearing in only one likely scripted gospel. One-third of the fabled(?) get cast out to the predators, (Matt 25: 14-30). The buried Talent never makes it to any market-place. The sense of market-place transactions, in fact, is completely superseded. There are none in the fable. The one Talent even gets sky-rocketed--insofar as there is any such capability in that timeframe. Baby Abandonment was known in that timeframe. Medieval Romans would toss babies into the Tiber River. Now Indiana is host to drop-off boxes. Red-States have their values, with basis-certain.
Some Hispanics are themselves less interested in a Minimum Wage raise, than they are in a Family Assistance plan. The transactions are more valuable than the wage--likely insufficient. Other than China, assistance and rules regarding assistance for newer families is not a policy, in any culture, anywhere. "Households" are not valued.
Anyone compares the Amendment Two crazies--gun supportive--and the Jan 6 Capitol Building insurgency. Is any militia anywhere better-served with entire arsenals in common use among insurgents? Are militias better served with armaments restrictions? People--Republicans, loosely speaking--are on board with more armaments, even applied in common practice.
The Hispanic contention would be said the more rational. The Jan 6 insurgency offered no transactions. Some participants were armed.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Lives Don't Matter: Especially Kneeling, at prayers(?), in Minnesota, (Amendment One(?)!)
