(June 9, 2021 at 7:26 pm)Belacqua Wrote:(June 9, 2021 at 6:48 pm)brewer Wrote: Acardiac twin is an in utero development abnormality creating a twin incompatible with human life. It does not therefore deserve X rights.
No one is arguing that something dead, or something incompatible with human life deserves human rights. If you think they are you haven't understood the arguments here.
Again, the original position was unborn human rights at conception.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.