Yes but that's only if there's actually a debate here.
No evidence of God and God=highly improbable=Christians lose by default. There is no real debate here.
It doesn't matter how fallacious the arguments are if it isn't even debatable, there's no debate. The Christians already lost it by default or its not a debate at all. Right?
Bascially: So what if you have fallacious arguments if they have already lost by default until they provide evidence? They need to give evidence of God first.
Because that's step 1 for the debate on God.
EvF
No evidence of God and God=highly improbable=Christians lose by default. There is no real debate here.
It doesn't matter how fallacious the arguments are if it isn't even debatable, there's no debate. The Christians already lost it by default or its not a debate at all. Right?
Bascially: So what if you have fallacious arguments if they have already lost by default until they provide evidence? They need to give evidence of God first.
Because that's step 1 for the debate on God.
EvF