They had already lost from the outset though. Step one was for them to provide evidence...until they do they've lost...there's no real debate....
Hey I could positively claim that the FSM DEFINITELY 100% doesn't exist in a debate with Pastafarian....does that mean I've lost the debate because my argument is fallacious? There's no real debate here is there! He believes in the FSM FFS! Until there's any evidence provided by this hypothetical Pastafarian for the existence of the FSM there's no debate here! The Pastafarian has already lost by default.
And it should be treated the same with Christians and belief in God in a debate as it would be Pastafarians and belief in the FSM.
Until there's any evidence of the FSM...there's no debate! The Pastafarian has already lost by default.
Until there's any evidence of God...there's no debate! The Christian has already lost by default.
Hey I could positively claim that the FSM DEFINITELY 100% doesn't exist in a debate with Pastafarian....does that mean I've lost the debate because my argument is fallacious? There's no real debate here is there! He believes in the FSM FFS! Until there's any evidence provided by this hypothetical Pastafarian for the existence of the FSM there's no debate here! The Pastafarian has already lost by default.
And it should be treated the same with Christians and belief in God in a debate as it would be Pastafarians and belief in the FSM.
Until there's any evidence of the FSM...there's no debate! The Pastafarian has already lost by default.
Until there's any evidence of God...there's no debate! The Christian has already lost by default.