(October 6, 2011 at 8:33 pm)ElDinero Wrote: We know you maintain your view, salty, because you're an offensive, disgraceful human being. Changing your position would require you to not be, so you're obliged to stay put. If you were white, you would probably think interracial marriage was immoral. I'll continue to insult you if you continue to say things that are insulting. Just because you don't use curse words, doesn't mean you occupy the high ground. Believe me, you're the one using foul language. And if you continue to occupy positions that look down their nose at demographics based on what your shitty old book says, you can expect to continue being made to feel unwelcome, especially by me.
To say that my argument is based in telling you what an ignorant person you are is to do something very familiar to people like you, we call it 'lying'. Read back and you will see that I have dedicated more than enough time enquiring about your positions, responding to them, pointing out fallacies and hypocrisy, as have numerous other people. The point you commend Faith No More for making has been made numerous times already by many others, including myself.
Why you go back to the argument of 'you don't know me, don't judge me' I have no idea, for two reasons. Firstly, I have already stated that your relationship with gay people that you know is IRRELEVANT. The post you quoted explained why it is irrelevant; are you able to understand sentences? For clarity's sake, let me say this about the fact that you talk politely to gay people: It doesn't make a blind bit of difference because you still acknowledge what they are doing as wrong. I am not accusing you of oppressing them, or being rude to them, or anything. Can I possibly make this any clearer? If you are still having trouble with this, go back to school.
Secondly, we post on a forum. I am completely entitled to (and indeed, can only) judge you on the content of your posts here. You can do the same and draw whatever conclusions you see fit, I don't give a shit. My conscience is clear. Only one of us is suffering from cognitive dissonance, reading up on why a flood couldn't happen and yet believing it did regardless, understanding that prejudice is prejudice and practising it anyway, understanding that homosexual love is equal to heterosexual love and yet describing it as immoral.
If you choose to only read the naughty words in my posts, then you could miss out on the fact that your argument has been torn to shreds by every single one of us. You don't have a leg to stand on. You still have not told us what it is that is wrong about homosexuality. Clue: Penises aren't designed for arseholes is not a reason, unless you can show that putting them in there causes harm to people. Can you show this, or can you not?
If you can, get the fuck on with it and take down the veil of your nicey nicey 'lets all get along' charade. If you can't, then accept that you don't have a clue why it's immoral, and you only think it is because of the only book you've ever read.
I am in full agreement. I have personally torn her argument to shreds, and all she has done in response is attack my method of argument (stating that I am not allowed to use personal experiences as a basis of knowledge, and that I am not to address her unless she addresses me first.), and call me a racist for comparing homosexuality as a genetic trait to being black as a genetic trait.
We could just as easily compare homosexuality to being white. It really makes no difference. She has no real argument, and the only one she can scrounge up is that the bible says it is so, so it is so. Then she asserted that things aren't immoral just because they hurt people and cited lying and stealing as examples of immorality that don't harm anyone!
I question, not only her intellect, but her morals as well. You know what group of people don't see lying and stealing as hurtful to people? SOCIOPATHS.
42
