Proposed Award - Kook of the Month
| Poll: Are you in favor or opposed to this proposal? This poll is closed. |
|||
| In favor | 12 | 63.16% | |
| Opposed | 7 | 36.84% | |
| Total | 19 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
Proposed Award - Kook of the Month
|
Again, why?
Fuck em.
You are currently experiencing a lucky and very brief window of awareness, sandwiched in between two periods of timeless and utter nothingness. So why not make the most of it, and stop wasting your life away trying to convince other people that there is something else? The reality is obvious.
 (December 23, 2011 at 7:37 am)Norfolk And Chance Wrote: Again, why? Well we could "fuck 'em" ....politely?? 
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
 RE: Proposed Award - Kook of the Month
December 23, 2011 at 8:19 am
(This post was last modified: December 23, 2011 at 8:22 am by Blam!.)
(December 23, 2011 at 7:37 am)Norfolk And Chance Wrote: Again, why?Because I'm trying not to be cruel? But, yeah, I do have limitations of religion tolerance. I wouldn't mind if we award with title: "Fuckwits" to the theists below. If theists condones pedophilia, Fuck 'em If theists condones slavery, Fuck 'em If theists condones the beatings to train girls, Fuck 'em If theists condones by indoctrinating the religion to children, Fuck 'em. If theists condones the power of prayer over modern medicine, Fuck 'em. If theists condemned homosexuality for their religious reasons, Fuck 'em. If theists want ID and Creationism to be teach in the schools, Fuck 'em. Lol. I'm contradicting myself, am I not? Still doesn't hurt to be polite anyway. So let's back to the topic of awards. Why not add contents to award like, the information why they are rewarded with award titled 'you are stupid' or whatever more appropriate title. -Theists' stupid comment and reference. -Reasons why the thiests' comment is stupid.  RE: Proposed Award - Kook of the Month
December 23, 2011 at 9:23 am
(This post was last modified: December 23, 2011 at 9:24 am by Blam!.)
(December 23, 2011 at 9:14 am)Napoleon Wrote:(December 23, 2011 at 5:01 am)Blam! Wrote: Point taken. What are we going to call them - "Fuckwit" or "Retard" or "Deluded" or "Child molester" - Which one is more appropriate title? Correct. And "Child molester" is an example of inappropriate title. (December 23, 2011 at 9:23 am)Blam! Wrote: Correct. And "Child molester" is an example of inappropriate title. Riiiighhht. And your point? I don't think calling someone a kook is nearly as offensive as calling someone a child molester. You can easily call someone a kook in jest, calling them a child molester is less funny due to the implications. (December 23, 2011 at 9:23 am)Blam! Wrote:(December 23, 2011 at 9:14 am)Napoleon Wrote:(December 23, 2011 at 5:01 am)Blam! Wrote: Point taken. What are we going to call them - "Fuckwit" or "Retard" or "Deluded" or "Child molester" - Which one is more appropriate title? It may well be, but to put it in the same sentence and same context as an appropriate title - such as "deluded", is contradictory and renders your point meaningless.
You are currently experiencing a lucky and very brief window of awareness, sandwiched in between two periods of timeless and utter nothingness. So why not make the most of it, and stop wasting your life away trying to convince other people that there is something else? The reality is obvious.
(December 23, 2011 at 9:36 am)Napoleon Wrote: Riiiighhht. And your point? I don't think calling someone a kook is nearly as offensive as calling someone a child molester.If the theist qualifies to have the "Kook" award, because he's stupid. It's no problem - hardly inappropriate nor bigoted title. I was saying to avoid the possible bigotry like calling Catholic a child molester. (December 23, 2011 at 9:43 am)Norfolk And Chance Wrote: It may well be, but to put it in the same sentence and same context as an appropriate title - such as "deluded", is contradictory and renders your point meaningless.You're right.  The appropriateness depends on the context of title that we are planning to make in future, no?
 Quote:Norfolk And Chance Wrote:. You're just taking the piss 'aving a laugh, in't it? You're not REALLY an ignorant bigot, are you?.   (December 21, 2011 at 5:39 pm)padraic Wrote: Seriously: What an obnoxious idea. Should such a thing ever be implemented I will leave immediately.In case you lack the sensitivity or wit to grasp it,your idea is a form of bullying. I loathe bullies. I do not approve of a form of negative award. Members spend far too much time as it is shitting on persistent annoyances to occasional, well meaning dolts. Slave to the Patriarchy no more
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Proposed Award - Kook of the Month
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Can I request a temp Ban for a month? | Heywood | 119 | 13197 |
May 27, 2015 at 8:07 pm Last Post: Mystical |
|
| During next month | BrokenQuill92 | 5 | 1926 |
March 21, 2014 at 1:35 pm Last Post: BrokenQuill92 |
|
| Proposed change to rep point system, no removals, edits only | Angrboda | 15 | 7690 |
October 31, 2012 at 7:01 am Last Post: jonb |
|
| Proposed Award - New Member of the Month | Jackalope | 7 | 3896 |
January 2, 2012 at 11:14 pm Last Post: Jackalope |
|
| Proposed Alteration to Forum Rules | Existentialist | 6 | 3547 |
October 27, 2010 at 8:42 am Last Post: Shell B |
|
