Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 28, 2024, 4:05 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
13 yr. old Christian shames Dawkins?
#21
RE: 13 yr. old Christian shames Dawkins?
The problem here is not the asking of
questions for after all that is what Science
does but asking of questions where there is a
clear agenda other than the curiosity to know. This
is nothing short of intellectual dishonesty and one then
could refuse to debate someone on those grounds but that
of course would only provide them with the propaganda they so
desire unfortunately. But is it not a tad strange that those who have
the answers should go asking others questions in the first place though

A MIND IS LIKE A PARACHUTE : IT DOES NOT WORK UNLESS IT IS OPEN
Reply
#22
RE: 13 yr. old Christian shames Dawkins?
It's a ruse. First it's "the Anointed One!" Then it's burn the witch! Like Joan? Didn't you see what happened to the Anointed One on Buffy?
[Image: twQdxWW.jpg]
Reply
#23
RE: 13 yr. old Christian shames Dawkins?
(January 8, 2012 at 6:16 am)twocompulsive Wrote: The problem here is not the asking of
questions for after all that is what Science
does but asking of questions where there is a
clear agenda other than the curiosity to know. This
is nothing short of intellectual dishonesty and one then
could refuse to debate someone on those grounds but that
of course would only provide them with the propaganda they so
desire unfortunately. But is it not a tad strange that those who have
the answers should go asking others questions in the first place though

Damnit...now my head is permanently slanted to the left after reading this post.

Reply
#24
RE: 13 yr. old Christian shames Dawkins?
(January 11, 2012 at 11:32 am)reverendjeremiah Wrote:
(January 8, 2012 at 6:16 am)twocompulsive Wrote: The problem here is not the asking of
questions for after all that is what Science
does but asking of questions where there is a
clear agenda other than the curiosity to know. This
is nothing short of intellectual dishonesty and one then
could refuse to debate someone on those grounds but that
of course would only provide them with the propaganda they so
desire unfortunately. But is it not a tad strange that those who have
the answers should go asking others questions in the first place though

Damnit...now my head is permanently slanted to the left after reading this post.

I'm afraid I dont read them.
Not that the contents lack merit , but purely because the slanted writing 'feels wrong'.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
#25
RE: 13 yr. old Christian shames Dawkins?
I guess he is "Too Compulsive"...get it...
Reply
#26
RE: 13 yr. old Christian shames Dawkins?
See, I can rattle on for incredibly long and detailed sentences about
the wonderfully droll topic of most eloquently put nothingness.
However, I find this style of writing to be self-referential
and quite incompatible with the abnormal use of
words unless you like to think out a good
common negative increment for
this particular font size and
and text decoration
styles.


But did any of
you think that
restricting yo-
-urself to not
a large area
of text but a
very small re-
-gion is diffi-
cult?????????

STACKENBLOCHEN!
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
Reply
#27
RE: 13 yr. old Christian shames Dawkins?
thanks for straightening my head
Reply
#28
RE: 13 yr. old Christian shames Dawkins?
13 yr. old Christian shames Dawkins Because they consider they
are not satisfy any thing in life and they want peace so be a perfect
direction and guide line they want for best life and peace in life.
Reply
#29
RE: 13 yr. old Christian shames Dawkins?
(January 11, 2012 at 10:54 pm)Moros Synackaon Wrote: See, I can rattle on for incredibly long and detailed sentences about
the wonderfully droll topic of most eloquently put nothingness.
However, I find this style of writing to be self-referential
and quite incompatible with the abnormal use of
words unless you like to think out a good
common negative increment for
this particular font size and
and text decoration
styles.


But did any of
you think that
restricting yo-
-urself to not
a large area
of text but a
very small re-
-gion is diffi-
cult?????????

STACKENBLOCHEN!

N
o
t

p
a
r
t
i
c
u
l
a
r
l
y

b
u
t

t
a
k
e
n

t
o

e
x
t
r
e
m
e
s

i
t

c
a
n

b
e

a

p
a
i
n

i
n

t
h
e

a
r
s
e

t
o

r
e
a
d
.
.
.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#30
RE: 13 yr. old Christian shames Dawkins?
S
T
O
P

I
T

B
U
T
T

H
O
L
E
S
!
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Beauty of Science - Richard Dawkins hilary 9 6354 August 2, 2015 at 1:38 pm
Last Post: Longhorn
  Dawkins on the Daily Show tonight. Brian37 5 2464 September 26, 2013 at 6:33 am
Last Post: Brian37
  Bill O'Reilly punks Richard Dawkins A Theist 45 30692 October 8, 2011 at 11:30 am
Last Post: Captain Scarlet
  Dawkins-If Religion worked like science.... dave4shmups 14 5749 October 12, 2010 at 8:43 pm
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)