Posts: 4349
Threads: 385
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation:
57
RE: Origin of life
September 12, 2008 at 3:13 am
Saying that, I ran Spybot last night and it nearly had a fit over all the entries in the registry by BearShare!!!
However, rather than just deleting it I did some research and found that all BearShare is doing is targeting you with adverts while you run the programme. As I keep Norton and Spybot running all the time I think I have it in check. In fact, BearShare themselves are pretty annoyed that all the anti-spyware programmes target them as spyware.
I have still to find another P2P programme that downloads a 700MB file in under 40 mins!!!
Posts: 14932
Threads: 684
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation:
143
RE: Origin of life
September 12, 2008 at 4:02 am
Odd. I keep getting "This video is unavailable" :S
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: Origin of life
September 24, 2008 at 12:43 pm
(This post was last modified: October 6, 2008 at 10:30 am by Edwardo Piet.)
Ha ha ha...read the bit called, "Is there a God?"? lmfao it's hilarious utter utter total f**king BSing shite.
No offense christian psuedo-scientists...but just as believers say hate the sin not the sinner; I say - hate the faith not the believer.
Posts: 157
Threads: 24
Joined: August 27, 2008
Reputation:
2
RE: Origin of life
October 17, 2008 at 1:54 pm
[/quote]
Well yes, the theory of Evolution is an unproven theory. If it were proven it would be a "Law". The fact still remains that there is more than enough evidence to support the theory, and Evolution itself (the actual process) is a fact. You should refute his argument with the fact that ID is also an "unproven" theory, and that there is no evidence for ID like there is for Evolution. The theory also lacks the evidence of the designer, which means it is incomplete.
[/quote]
Accordingly you could say about any theory that it is not proven.
You know what?
1+1=2 is at the base of science, whithout it there exists no measurement of any physical entity.
Well,1 plus what 1 equals two? Eggs, dogs, blondes,? what ?
If one goes down to atoms ,in the search of two identical entities.
they are also nonidentical as are any subatomical particles and if you arrive at quantums you will drown in the uncertainity principle.
What I'm trying to say is that every theory and even the most simple of laws have to be simplified to a certain amount in order to be accepted.
That's the case with the evolutionary theory of life it has it's simplifications but it certainly needs no designer in order to be proven at this time of our understanding of nature.
May be that in future evolution may prove to change itself in a higher order of evolution ..only God knows.