Robot Rights.

[Napoléon]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWNPeNEvM...re=related

Watching this made me think. If we ever create machines that are so intelligent that they are self aware, should they be given rights? Similar or even equal to humans?

[fuckass365]

Well, the moral answer to that would probably be yes. How would we be able to distinguish consciousness from the illusion of consciousness though? A robot could easily say that it is aware of it's existence but it really is not. Secondly, the purpose of a Robot in an advanced society would be that of a servant. They will be created for the sole purpose of servitude and creating one so advanced that it could possibly achieve consciousness puts us at risk of a "Skynet" type situation.

[Napoléon]

Well, the moral answer to that would probably be yes. How would we be able to distinguish consciousness from the illusion of consciousness though? A robot could easily say that it is aware of it's existence but it really is not.

Why is it not?

[fuckass365]

It would be hard to distinguish, how would you measure consciousness?

[NoMoreFaith]

One of those nasty little questions that at first seems simple until you give it hard thought.

Personally, I think a machine has rights if it can be made to feel harm, and through that extension, you can apply a golden rule.

If the machine is capable of being harmed (and comprehend that harm) in a manner of which you would not want to be harmed yourself in the same situation, then it has that right.

However, I think true self-aware computerised intelligence would appear completely alien to ourselves. I think the error in a lot of AI creation is trying to make computers act like humans, despite a completely different construction and methodology of comprehension.

In this way, intelligence should be viewed in the same way we would approach alien intelligence. If the method of intelligence is substantially different, with different motivations behind the decision making process, then it is important, in terms of preventing harm that would to us be immoral.

Asimov got there a long time ago, with I, Robot.

1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.

Without restriction, our own values, and self-protection would be at risk if you allowed an alien, or robot intelligence too much power over mankind.

[Rayaan]

They will be created for the sole purpose of servitude and creating one so advanced that it could possibly achieve consciousness puts us at risk of a "Skynet" type situation.

[Tiberius]

Chickens can feel harm, do they have rights?

[frankiej]

I would imagine they would get treated similar to pets.

[Paul the Human]

Spayed and Neutered?

[Napoléon]

Chickens can feel harm, do they have rights?

Yeah but are they self aware in the same sense that humans are?