Creationist explanation for the fossil record?

[popeyespappy]

Even though it is a bit dated.

Inadvertent irony ftw!

I've been waiting for 6 months for someone to catch that.

[Minimalist]

Carbon dating is of no use because the carbon isotope fully depletes within ~50 000-80 000 (I've seen a wide range of numbers, hence the 30k difference). I'm not sure what isotope they would use for fossils.

Anyone know?

Several different ones. The one I'm most familiar with is potassium argon dating. Mind you, the fossils aren't directly dated, the location in the geological column they're found in is dated

Of course, if anything the dickheads said was true then you could use C14 as everything would be within 6,000 of their stupid fucking creation. But you can't use C14 to carbon date rocks...which is what fossils have become.

Another one of those fucking "facts" that the shitheads simply cannot process.

[libalchris]

So nobody has an answer? No creationist can explain the fossil record? I genuinely am wondering if any creationist thinks they can explain the ordering of the fossils in the geological column.