Posts: 39
Threads: 3
Joined: May 17, 2012
Reputation:
0
RE: The Brain=Mind Fallacy
June 1, 2012 at 8:38 am
So because a brain has electrical activity and neurons hold and exchange charges as a natural process it means ghosts/souls are real? If the video memory of your computer is used to draw on screen a fantasy character in a video game does that make that character real? That memory has a couple of million of transistors that hold information in a dynamic mode (it changes many times per second to give the watcher the illusion of movement). Your brain has several billion neurons that hold information. The change in that information is what we call thoughts. I can't explain it in a more simpler way, honestly.
I have no problem sharing a common ancestor with the apes; it's being related to some people that bothers me.
Posts: 8719
Threads: 128
Joined: March 1, 2012
Reputation:
53
RE: The Brain=Mind Fallacy
June 1, 2012 at 10:49 am
(This post was last modified: June 1, 2012 at 10:50 am by Neo-Scholastic.)
Two theories are being presented to justify the material basis for mind. In the first case, various configurations and states of matter are said to produce mental phenomena that did not previously exist. The second position claims that brain-states are mental phenomena. Both theories try to get something for nothing and reveals how hollow materialist claims are, as I will explain.
As pointed out chickens produce eggs.Chickens and eggs both fall into the same category of being. Both are physical objects. The car/speed analogy is more complex but follows the same logic. Speed is the description of a material state, a relationship of physical objects in time and space. The parts share the same physical properties as the car, including speed. Each part also moves through physical space in time. At smaller scales you have Brownian motion and at still smaller scales atomic vibrations. Motion can be described by even more fundamental physical properties, like mass. Yet in this case you also see that atomic particles have mass, the car parts have mass, and the whole car has mass. The parts share the properties of the whole. They can interact because complex material states are aggregates of similar simple material states. Likewise, you can describe complex mental properties, like a memory, in terms of simpler mental properties like sensation.
The difficulties arise when you start to attribute one category of being, mental phenomena, to another categories of being, like physical objects. If you attribute complex mental properties like emotions to a complex physical object like the brain, then you must attribute simpler mental properties to parts of the physical brain, like the visual cortex. Just as the whole brain and its parts have mass, the whole brain and its parts share an experiential component. Followed to its logical extreme, you conclude that conscious experience is a fundamental property of reality on par with mass.
The problem for materialism is this. Materialism only accepts four fundamental forces associated with material properties. There are no mental ‘forces’ or basic properties of mind from which to build complex mental properties like conscious self awareness. The materialist perspective has no place to insert mind.
It’s attempts to explain consciousness are on par with magic.
Posts: 3872
Threads: 39
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation:
43
RE: The Brain=Mind Fallacy
June 1, 2012 at 11:08 am
(This post was last modified: June 1, 2012 at 12:06 pm by Ace Otana.)
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Posts: 13900
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: The Brain=Mind Fallacy
June 1, 2012 at 12:18 pm
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 3160
Threads: 56
Joined: February 14, 2012
Reputation:
39
RE: The Brain=Mind Fallacy
June 1, 2012 at 12:34 pm
(This post was last modified: June 1, 2012 at 12:35 pm by Reforged.)
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: The Brain=Mind Fallacy
June 1, 2012 at 12:57 pm
Correlation is not necessarily causation. But there is no causation without controlled correlation. Causation is a wholely contained subset of correlation. You have no correlation, so you have no disembodied psych. Now go away.