Dinosaurs and Man

[ScienceLovesGod]

First of all, if the Lord God put instinct into every animal so that they sense drastic changes in weather, then He put it in their instinct to travel to the Ark, which is still on top of Mt. Ararat, and gave them instinct not to harm another creature while on board. Second, why do you insist that the Ark needed fully-grown animals?

[Annik]

First of all, if the Lord God put instinct into every animal so that they sense drastic changes in weather, then He put it in their instinct to travel to the Ark, which is still on top of Mt. Ararat, and gave them instinct not to harm another creature while on board. Second, why do you insist that the Ark needed fully-grown animals?

I highly doubt that it rests on Mt. Masis. Do you know how many animals that ship would have had to carry? How much the food would have been? There is no way Noah's little dingy could have supported two of each animal, his family and the food required to feed all of them.

[popeyespappy]

I don't know what I'm most happy about. This pic, or that adorable dog in your avatar!

Pops is a handsome boy isn’t he....

[Epimethean]

Ohhhh, yeah! They were all infant animals. That is sooooo cool!!!!

[popeyespappy]

---

---

First of all, if the Lord God put instinct into every animal so that they sense drastic changes in weather, then He put it in their instinct to travel to the Ark, which is still on top of Mt. Ararat, and gave them instinct not to harm another creature while on board. Second, why do you insist that the Ark needed fully-grown animals?

I don't insist your fairy tale needs anything.

[Annik]

I don't know what I'm most happy about. This pic, or that adorable dog in your avatar!

Pops is a handsome boy isn’t he....

Cute! Is he a retired dog, a pound puppy or a pet store dog?

[popeyespappy]

Cute! Is he a retired dog, a pound puppy or a pet store dog?

He's a retired racer, and I assure you he takes his retirement quite seriously.

[ScienceLovesGod]

Famously, the tortured paradox that is Answers in Genesis lists the Paluxy tracks among its Arguments Creationists Should Avoid, since "further research is still needed, new research has invalidated aspects of it, or biblical implications may discount it". Basically, when even the repellent Ken Ham says you're talking shit, you really are in trouble.

The article in which John D. morris says not to bring up the Paluxy Tracks is cited from the year 1986. It does not mention Dr. Patton, or the evidence this video shows.

[Cyberman]

Hey, don't tell me; I think John Morris is at least as big a fraud as his dad, along with Patton, Juby, both Hovinds, Pendleton et al (and most especially the revolting Ken Ham). It's your case that's at stake here, not mine.

[ScienceLovesGod]

First of all, if the Lord God put instinct into every animal so that they sense drastic changes in weather, then He put it in their instinct to travel to the Ark, which is still on top of Mt. Ararat, and gave them instinct not to harm another creature while on board. Second, why do you insist that the Ark needed fully-grown animals?

I highly doubt that it rests on Mt. Masis. Do you know how many animals that ship would have had to carry? How much the food would have been? There is no way Noah's little dingy could have supported two of each animal, his family and the food required to feed all of them.

Watch "The history and the facts about the Ark of Noah". It clearly gives mathematical equations about how many species were on the Ark (for some reason did he did not include insects, worms, etc. but nevertheless, there still would be plenty of room on board). The plant-eaters ate hay, grains, etc. The meat-eaters ate dried meat.

---

Hey, don't tell me; I think John Morris is at least as big a fraud as his dad, along with Patton, Juby, both Hovinds, Pendleton et al (and most especially the revolting Ken Ham). It's your case that's at stake here, not mine.

There is no case at stake here, especially if you watch the video.