Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 14, 2024, 5:17 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
CERN confirms new particle.
#21
RE: CERN confirms new particle.
There's also the possibility it was named the God particle ironically, as in it ought to be there if the predictions made for its existence are anything to go by; but buggered if anyone can find it.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#22
RE: CERN confirms new particle.
I read that this thing could make travelling at light speed a possibility. Enterprise captain's chair, here I come!
You really believe in a man who has helped to save the world twice, with the power to change his physical appearance? An alien who travels though time and space--in a police box?!? [Image: TARDIS.gif]
Reply
#23
RE: CERN confirms new particle.
Lightspeed travel would be horrible unless all the relativistic problems can be ironed out. Even then the travel times to all but the nearest stars would be prohibitive. Don't get me wrong, I'm completely on board with opening up the final frontier. What we need is some way to circumvent the light barrier - just imagine a news report showing virtually real-time footage from the first interstellar probe.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#24
RE: CERN confirms new particle.
This is fucking awesome! I'm going on a tour round CERN in a week or 2, I'll hopefully bring a camera!

(July 7, 2012 at 5:50 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Lightspeed travel would be horrible unless all the relativistic problems can be ironed out. Even then the travel times to all but the nearest stars would be prohibitive. Don't get me wrong, I'm completely on board with opening up the final frontier. What we need is some way to circumvent the light barrier - just imagine a news report showing virtually real-time footage from the first interstellar probe.

Stephen Hawking did say wormholes might be a way of travelling large distances quickly, though there are lots of problems with this.
If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world. - J.R.R Tolkien
Reply
#25
RE: CERN confirms new particle.
Why do both science fans and theists want to turn the obvious into a mystery? All discovering something new means for humans is that we discovered something new. And after we discover something new, we want to look further for something else. There is no mystery in this.

As small as this planet is and as long as the universe has been around, being a blip in all this, I don't think it would be a horrible guess that our species, by the time it goes extinct, will know a fraction of the "full knowledge". There is room for discovering more.

As much as I get a lip twitch for the god of the gaps bullshit, I also get a lip twitch from atheists who jump gaps from protons to transporters.

There is no need for a god for the future, that I am sure of. But even for scientists, all discovering a smaller particle, at this point, would mean, is that we discovered a smaller particle. That does not mean we should stop and go "this is it", but we also should not let even pet speculation of scientists be immune from the scrutiny that has always served humanity well in making progress.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Are Photons the Particle Associatid with the CMB? Rhondazvous 5 1347 September 9, 2017 at 12:34 pm
Last Post: Rhondazvous
  Anti-Matter at CERN chimp3 24 4108 December 21, 2016 at 7:12 am
Last Post: I_am_not_mafia
  Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why? theBorg 40 7117 August 21, 2016 at 2:13 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  First collisions at the LHC with unprecedented Energy! (Ask a particle physisicist) Alex K 385 63078 August 8, 2016 at 5:03 am
Last Post: Alex K
  Elementary Particle for Heat? Rhondazvous 21 3527 February 21, 2016 at 5:03 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  LHC News - New particle found dyresand 0 1047 July 14, 2015 at 6:03 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  Why the Highs Boson can no longer be called the God particle... max-greece 12 3210 May 11, 2014 at 9:30 am
Last Post: max-greece
  Mach–Zehnder interferometer, Particle or Wave? little_monkey 3 2070 May 22, 2013 at 9:18 pm
Last Post: Sal
  Spitzer confirms cosmological inflation Jackalope 21 6120 October 6, 2012 at 1:00 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  Will the LHC find the 'God' Particle? CoxRox 11 5265 August 3, 2012 at 9:22 pm
Last Post: Jackalope



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)