The Bible isn't just fiction. It's a mix. Do you deny historical accuracy?
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 2, 2025, 9:40 pm
Thread Rating:
Does anyone have one reason that supports infallibilty?
|
I deny that any historical accuracy prevents it from being ficiton.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
(July 20, 2012 at 3:56 pm)catfish Wrote: The Bible isn't just fiction. It's a mix. Do you deny historical accuracy? What ? A mix of fact and fiction ? The bits that are accurate are infallible and the bits that are fiction are . . . . well stories. Regards Grimesy
Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful. — Edward Gibbon
RE: Does anyone have one reason that supports infallibilty?
July 20, 2012 at 4:38 pm
(This post was last modified: July 20, 2012 at 4:41 pm by catfish.)
Well, it is made from many authors and put together at a much later date. All or nothing is a very narrow-minded view, no?
If one pixel in your eye does not funtion and your mind fills it in with non-existent stimuli, does it render everything you see a halucination?
You tell me, you're the one responding to my question.
Does "Dracula" taking place in an actual country keep it from being entirely fiction? The fact is, the bible could be a completely historical dictation until a dead jew rises from the grave, without which the bible is nothing, and it would still be fiction.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Soooo, since science knows that the mind fills in non-exsitent data in one's perceived vision, I can claim everyone hallucinates?
Kings, geneologies, geography, scientific facts (both direct and possibly eluded to), prophecies, etc...
But I'm looking for a logical reason to either believe in the "infallible word of God" theory or not. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)