Creationism in UK Schools

[Chuff]

Over the last few years we've heard lots of controversy about the upsurge of creationism/intelligent design in United States education system.

I have been watching with interest, whilst also keeping an eye on our own fair isle's governmental policy.

The creationists are certainly making progress, and have just been given approval by the education secretary to open several 'Free Schools' which will receive state funding and are to be run by groups with creationist views.

Mrs Chuff wrote to the Secretary of State regarding the issue, and we just received a reply which I've pasted below. I am hopeful that the promises in the response are upheld and we can hold back this relentless tidalwave of anti-science, mysticism and unreasoning.


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 02 August 2012 14:22
To:
Subject: Case Reference 2012/0052708

Dear Mrs [Chuff]
Thank you for your recent correspondence, addressed to the Secretary of State, expressing disagreement with his decision to support a number of Free School projects that you believe intend to teach creationism. I hope you will appreciate the Secretary of State for Education receives a vast amount of correspondence and is unable to reply to each one personally. It is for this reason I have been asked to reply.
No Free School is allowed to teach creationism. The Free School application guidance published by the Department now specifically says creationism, intelligent design and similar ideas cannot be taught as valid scientific theories.
Furthermore, the funding agreements for all Free Schools state that divine creation should not be taught as an 'evidence-based view or theory' (a scientific theory) in any lesson: so if a school did do this they would be putting their funding at risk. We are confident that the Free School projects you mention will follow the rules, having explored these questions robustly with them at interview.
Prior to entering into a funding agreement, the Academy Trust is required to carry out a consultation about their plans to open a Free School. Consultations can be run in a number of ways including surveys, the launch of a simple website, meetings of key individuals and open public meetings.
Academy Trusts also need to demonstrate that they have considered the views of their stakeholders. Most do this by publishing a report setting out the key findings of their consultation.
Every application approved, including those mentioned in your letter, has had to demonstrate that the new school will provide a broad and balanced curriculum. Free Schools are subject to Ofsted inspections in the same way as all other state schools, and the government has powers to intervene in a school where there is significant cause for concern.
Please be assured that the Department will be working with the projects mentioned over the coming months to ensure that the assurances they have provided us with are honoured.

As part of our commitment to improving the service we provide to our customers, we are interested in hearing your views and would welcome your comments via our website at: http://www.education.gov.uk/pcusurvey
Yours sincerely
Sandra Duggan
Public Communications Unit
http://www.education.gov.uk

[NoraBrimstone]

Thanks for sharing this! Are yourself or your wife members of the BHA? I think they'd love to read that; they have an ongoing campaign, you see.

[Napoléon]

No Free School is allowed to teach creationism. The Free School application guidance published by the Department now specifically says creationism, intelligent design and similar ideas cannot be taught as valid scientific theories.

And that America, is how you do it.

[Tiberius]

Erm, are you legally allowed to publish that email? If not, please remove it.

[Shell B]

I would check the law, but I am pretty sure you are allowed to publicize anything that is sent to you, though the entirety of it, I'm not sure about. I would check media laws, as the media often publicizes letters sent to them.

[Anomalocaris]

I think the right to publicize content of email sent to you is governed by the principle of "if you can't keep your secrets, then why should I be burdened with keeping it for you?".

[Shell B]

I'm with you there, Chuck. No qualms whatsoever about posting shit people send to me. In fact, if someone sends me a particularly stupid email, I would be less likely to trashbin it then to send it on to someone else.

[Chuff]

Erm, are you legally allowed to publish that email? If not, please remove it.

I was never under the impression that it was confidential or privileged information, and I posted it because I thought it was interesting and relevant to people here.

I cannot edit the post - Please remove it if you think you need to (or can you give me the ability to edit it and I will get rid of the headers etc)

Thanks

---

Thanks for sharing this! Are yourself or your wife members of the BHA? I think they'd love to read that; they have an ongoing campaign, you see.

Not yet, but we are planning to - I don't mind if you repost there, but it might be worth checking with them first considering the objections raised here.
[EDIT] I have just signed up to, and spoken with the BHA and have sent this onto them - They are running a campaign at the moment against the free schools. thanks for the heads up Nora

[NoraBrimstone]

You're welcome! The BHA is wonderful, I'm pleased I got them some new members.

[All Knowing Hippie]

i just cant wait to see what Richard Dawkins has to say about this.This is going to be epic