Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 25, 2024, 4:57 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The paradox of acceptance vs rejection in secular settings
#31
RE: The paradox of acceptance vs rejection in secular settings
Who thinks that (the infamous "they")? Which group should and which shouldn't? What bias? Towards or against what?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#32
RE: The paradox of acceptance vs rejection in secular settings
(September 6, 2012 at 2:40 pm)genkaus Wrote:
(September 6, 2012 at 2:28 pm)Vincenzo "Vinny" G. Wrote: No, I don't buy your explanation. It seems bizarre. I wouldn't say that everybody does equally well in totally secular environments. There has to be a period of adjustment, a period of accustomization. And I think typical secular environments don't have that. While they think there should be accustomization for some groups, evidently it's not for others.

This, I think reflects the bias inherent in typical secular environments.

And why "should" it be there? Some groups get accustomed easily because their values match up with the secular ones. Others don't because theirs' don't. If secular environments had that period of adjustment for some groups, then that would suggest bias in favor of those groups. You can't be biased for doing nothing.

By not favoring adjustments they are being biased.

I mean why have a situation where some people, for no fault of their own struggle to get to grips? They didn't choose for it to be so difficult. They were born into their own culture and religion.

I think this shows quite clearly how secularism is unfair.
Reply
#33
RE: The paradox of acceptance vs rejection in secular settings
Facepalm

No, they didn't choose to be born into their religion or culture, but they do choose to remain in their religion or culture. That would be called "through fault of their own" nothing negative implied by this, of course. If a person wishes to be a religious conservative in a secular liberal society they are free to do so. Plenty of these people about Vinny.

You're actually attempting to make the case that secularism is unfair because it doesn't give special treatment? You have got to be fucking kidding me....

What kind of special attention should be given, btw, the kind of special attention we see so often from conservative religious societies? Oh, whats the word..ah yes, persecution.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#34
RE: The paradox of acceptance vs rejection in secular settings
(September 6, 2012 at 3:14 pm)Rhythm Wrote: You're actually attempting to make the case that secularism is unfair because it doesn't give special treatment? You have got to be fucking kidding me....

That's what I thought from page 1 and why I asked if he was trolling.
[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]
Reply
#35
RE: The paradox of acceptance vs rejection in secular settings
Trolls gotta troll. You have to understand that he has made it plainly clear that he thinks at least one group of religious people downright deserve special attention. Muslims, yes, "especially" muslims. Jerkoff
(strangely, this is a sentiment shared by right wingers and airport security the world over-and that's gone really well for us thusfar)
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#36
RE: The paradox of acceptance vs rejection in secular settings
Well I deserve to have a hot guy go down on me every day, but I don't ask for it at work.
[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]
Reply
#37
RE: The paradox of acceptance vs rejection in secular settings
In that particular case correlation may prove causation. lol.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#38
RE: The paradox of acceptance vs rejection in secular settings
(September 6, 2012 at 3:00 pm)Vincenzo "Vinny" G. Wrote: By not favoring adjustments they are being biased.

No they are not. By not paying extra attention to the dumb student, the teacher is not showing bias towards the smart students either.

(September 6, 2012 at 3:00 pm)Vincenzo "Vinny" G. Wrote: I mean why have a situation where some people, for no fault of their own struggle to get to grips? They didn't choose for it to be so difficult. They were born into their own culture and religion.

And the dumb student didn't choose to be dumb. One person's special circumstances do not entitle him to special treatment nor does it warrant any special privileges.

(September 6, 2012 at 3:00 pm)Vincenzo "Vinny" G. Wrote: I think this shows quite clearly how secularism is unfair.

All it shows is that the world is unfair and secularism has found the most fair way to treat everyone.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Sexual Abuse in Social Context: Clergy and other (Secular) Professionals. Nishant Xavier 61 5744 July 16, 2023 at 1:54 pm
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  Why Atheism/Secular Humanism... Part II TheReal 53 27171 April 23, 2018 at 4:48 pm
Last Post: Mystic
  Bill Maher - Openly Secular PSA Minimalist 13 3566 August 1, 2015 at 6:22 pm
Last Post: Jenny A
  Quite the Paradox StealthySkeptic 1 1137 May 15, 2015 at 12:09 pm
Last Post: StealthySkeptic
  How popular are secular households? Delysid 21 5112 March 17, 2015 at 12:47 pm
Last Post: robvalue
  Secular Funeral Jenny A 32 6856 January 27, 2015 at 11:56 am
Last Post: Jenny A
  Bill Maher's Ad for Openly Secular.Org Minimalist 5 2528 January 14, 2015 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: KevinM1
  Rejection of All that is Holy Neo-Scholastic 32 5966 November 19, 2014 at 3:22 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Atheist vs Secular Humanist Fromper 13 5221 April 15, 2014 at 11:20 pm
Last Post: mralstoner
  Mutuality: A secular ethics project zvi 19 9826 October 15, 2013 at 4:00 pm
Last Post: Vincenzo Vinny G.



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)