You Know You Are A Conspiracy Theorist If…

[JohnDG]

Great post on infowars.com here's the link http://www.infowars.com/you-know-you-are...eorist-if/

Here's a little bit.

- You are capable of critical thinking.
-You distrust mainstream media.
- You like nature.
- You think it’s a good idea to spend the Friday after Thanksgiving with your family rather than camping outside Best Buy to get a cheap plasma television made in China.
- You think it’s a little strange that WTC building 7 came down at free fall speed on 9/11 yet it was never hit by a plane.
- You think that drones in America might not be for Al Qaeda.
- You would like to be able to get on a plane without having to engage in a mandatory radiation bath and digital strip search.
- You have read a book in the past year.
- You think you have the right to protest.

[Minimalist]

Conspiracy theorists also have the ability to ignore any evidence that there is no conspiracy or, even worse, to declare such evidence part of the "conspiracy."

[festive1]

Honey, I worked for the federal government for about a year... For the most part I say the government can't find it's own ass with two hands... Granted, I wasn't working for an "intelligence" agency, but outside of the FBI, CIA, Homeland Security, etc. the fed. is actually quite bogged down in the mire of bureaucratic nonsense. And the "intelligence" agencies... well, they're kinda like the gestapo, no?

[Tino]

- You think it’s a little strange that WTC building 7 came down at free fall speed on 9/11 yet it was never hit by a plane.

You're correct that Building 7 wasn't hit by a plane. Do you know if it was hit by anything else?

[cratehorus]

- You think it’s a little strange that WTC building 7 came down at free fall speed on 9/11 yet it was never hit by a plane.

You're correct that Building 7 wasn't hit by a plane. Do you know if it was hit by anything else?

yes it was hit by a thermite detonation.............. sorry, I know all this shit.......................... but i refuse too aknowledge ANY OF IT because of the sheer, absolutely horriffying, amount of misinformation surrounding it

[Minimalist]

http://conspiracies.skepticproject.com/a...mitedfires

Some more quotes and interesting information related to the damage of the building[17]:

Captain Chris Boyle
Engine 94 - 18 years

Boyle: ...on the north and east side of 7 it didn't look like there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didn't look good.

Firehouse: When you looked at the south side, how close were you to the base of that side?

Boyle: I was standing right next to the building, probably right next to it.

Firehouse: When you had fire on the 20 floors, was it in one window or many?

Boyle: There was a huge gaping hole and it was scattered throughout there. It was a huge hole. I would say it was probably about a third of it, right in the middle of it. And so after Visconti came down and said nobody goes in 7, we said all right, we'll head back to the command post. We lost touch with him. I never saw him again that day.

Other Fire Department officials thought collapse was almost certain:

"...Captain Varriale told Chief Coloe and myself that 7 World Trade Center was badly damaged on the south side and definitely in danger of collapse. Chief Coloe said we were going to evacuate the collapse zone around 7 World Trade Center, which we did."[18]

"The biggest decision we had to make was to clear the area and create a collapse zone around the severely damaged [WTC Building 7]. A number of fire officers and companies assessed the damage to the building. The appraisals indicated that the building's integrity was in serious doubt."[19]

More firemen reported that the damage progressed as the day continued[20]:

Deputy Chief Peter Hayden
Division 1 - 33 years

...also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 o'clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o'clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse.

Firehouse: Was there heavy fire in there right away?

Hayden: No, not right away, and that's probably why it stood for so long because it took a while for that fire to develop. It was a heavy body of fire in there and then we didn't make any attempt to fight it. That was just one of those wars we were just going to lose. We were concerned about the collapse of a 47-story building there. We were worried about additional collapse there of what was remaining standing of the towers and the Marriott, so we started pulling the people back after a couple of hours of surface removal and searches along the surface of the debris. We started to pull guys back because we were concerned for their safety.

[Tea Earl Grey Hot]

...
- You think it’s a little strange that WTC building 7 came down at free fall speed on 9/11 yet it was never hit by a plane.
...

Hey, you have to remember that those planes were filled with the special liquid that they use to poison us through contrails. Who knows what that stuff can do when ignited!

[CapnAwesome]

http://conspiracies.skepticproject.com/a...mitedfires

Some more quotes and interesting information related to the damage of the building[17]:

Captain Chris Boyle
Engine 94 - 18 years

Boyle: ...on the north and east side of 7 it didn't look like there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didn't look good.

Firehouse: When you looked at the south side, how close were you to the base of that side?

Boyle: I was standing right next to the building, probably right next to it.

Firehouse: When you had fire on the 20 floors, was it in one window or many?

Boyle: There was a huge gaping hole and it was scattered throughout there. It was a huge hole. I would say it was probably about a third of it, right in the middle of it. And so after Visconti came down and said nobody goes in 7, we said all right, we'll head back to the command post. We lost touch with him. I never saw him again that day.

Other Fire Department officials thought collapse was almost certain:

"...Captain Varriale told Chief Coloe and myself that 7 World Trade Center was badly damaged on the south side and definitely in danger of collapse. Chief Coloe said we were going to evacuate the collapse zone around 7 World Trade Center, which we did."[18]

"The biggest decision we had to make was to clear the area and create a collapse zone around the severely damaged [WTC Building 7]. A number of fire officers and companies assessed the damage to the building. The appraisals indicated that the building's integrity was in serious doubt."[19]

More firemen reported that the damage progressed as the day continued[20]:

Deputy Chief Peter Hayden
Division 1 - 33 years

...also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 o'clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o'clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse.

Firehouse: Was there heavy fire in there right away?

Hayden: No, not right away, and that's probably why it stood for so long because it took a while for that fire to develop. It was a heavy body of fire in there and then we didn't make any attempt to fight it. That was just one of those wars we were just going to lose. We were concerned about the collapse of a 47-story building there. We were worried about additional collapse there of what was remaining standing of the towers and the Marriott, so we started pulling the people back after a couple of hours of surface removal and searches along the surface of the debris. We started to pull guys back because we were concerned for their safety.

Shhhhh
That's too much reading and thinking for a conspiracy theorist. They are busy watching shittily done videos with creepy music in the background.

Tower 7 never fell at freefall speed, and those who believe it have never looked into it, very likely only seen videos of it falling from one angle and certainly never read what you posted above.

[JohnDG]

Either way your eyes delude you. You can read the facts all day but you still don't know what happened, you can watch videos all day from different angles and still get bs from it. In the long run, neither matters only the death of innocent people.

I don't agree with everything that was in the list it was just interesting because some of it is pretty legit critical thinking. I have the feeling you attribute every single item in the list to me which is not true and im not even inclined to believe anything anyone here says about the towers unless they are a metal worker, demolitions expert or had inside knowledge of the event which I seriously doubt and would not believe.

[The Grand Nudger]

I do wish that elements of our government were competent enough to pull something like this off...I really really do....but evidence suggests otherwise.