Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 4, 2024, 10:10 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The logical consequences of omnipotence
Re: The logical consequences of omnipotence
[The Christian] does not think God will love us because we are good, but that God will make us good because He loves us

C S Lewis
Reply
RE: The logical consequences of omnipotence
typical non answer to a question not asked in the face of a valid point
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!

Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.

Dead wrong.  The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.

Quote:Some people deserve hell.

I say again:  No exceptions.  Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it.  As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.

[Image: tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif]
Reply
Re: RE: The logical consequences of omnipotence
(January 28, 2013 at 11:27 am)missluckie26 Wrote: typical non answer to a question not asked in the face of a valid point

Please make a valid point
Reply
RE: The logical consequences of omnipotence
(January 28, 2013 at 1:27 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:
(January 28, 2013 at 11:27 am)missluckie26 Wrote: typical non answer to a question not asked in the face of a valid point

Please make a valid point
You know what she meant. All you've been doing is stating what you believe and responding to opposing arguments not with arguments of your own but with distractions; condescending dismissals, insults, faux-pity, and so on (and you even have the lack of self-awareness to get offended when you think somebody does any of these things to you). That's normal behavior for somebody who's having trouble coming up for coherent rationalizations for their beliefs--and it's disturbingly hilarious that you defend these tactics by simply stating that atheism is so far from being valid that it don't deserve an actual response. If that's what you really think, what are you doing here to start with?
Reply
RE: The logical consequences of omnipotence
(January 28, 2013 at 1:27 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:
(January 28, 2013 at 11:27 am)missluckie26 Wrote: typical non answer to a question not asked in the face of a valid point

Please make a valid point


Sorry thought I'd made my point clear.. Please note that I'm definitely not a debator, just someone trying to get you to see what I see, in you.

I guess I see my valid Point as being that just because I'm an athiest doesn't mean my viewpoint on life is bleak, nor does it make me a cruel, unhappy, or negative. As a matter of fact, all of those attributes are what you yourself are currently engaged in, yet I see you in denial because your view point of the earth is overshadowed by the illusions provided by your religion.

Example:
"He deserved what he got, and if he didn't then he's goin to hell anyways."

Quote: Fear is what rules the guilty.

*Cruelty. Who makes you the judge of your brothers? A book, written by man. I don't care much if this is what you think as I don't feel the need to dictate others' thoughts--but these thoughts by people with your world view have been enacted into law and people are dying because of it. You see nothing wrong with the vindication, and I have an issue with that. People are dying, who even you yourself say have hope through Jesus in repentance. Yet you see their deaths as a liberation into another life (allbeit eternal damnation) that you have absolutely no proof for, while we're all horrified at your sense of 'justice'.

Quote:I find it interesting that our ('western'?) criminal Justice systems are based on the religious concept of forgiveness. The irreligious answer to injustice is the chopping off of hands/ tit for tat vigilante type justice. There is no real justification I can see in a secular court for forgiveness.

If you consider the death penalty, forgiveness--then all right. I can't see how you can say that tit/tat vigilante type justice is attributed to irreligiousness. The society that comes to mind when you mention this chopping off of hands nonsensical justice--is Muslim cultures (hence religious based). As someone said earlier--just take a look at an athiest sense of justice by looking at some of the least violent nations in the world such as Denmark. If you would please provide examples to your statement of a degrading of society being directly related to irreligiousness, I'd very much appreciate it as I see the complete opposite.

Example of Negativity:
"There will always be evil in the world, pray away your troubles and concerns to the almighty and know that justice will indeed come, just not in this lifetime."

Quote:If you accept that injustice happens, then you live by that. You have less reason to be just yourself, because that would to be to put yourself at a disadvantage in how you understand the world to operate. Do you see how this would be different if you understood there to be complete justice? How a person rationalising justice prevailing might have a totally different outlook to yourself?

Attribute I see in you is ultimately: negativity. My reasoning for this is that evil is always overcome able, and there is a reason to fight it in this life. What's more is there's actually more of a reason to live life justly because this is the only justice available. It's real justice, whatever justice is found on this earth--and whatever injustices that are endured are not a reason to be bleak or negative about because humanity is always evolving and learning from its' mistakes.
I see in you, a complacency in the standard. If you were just negative about it (negative being the opposite of positive whose definition is a good, positive, or constructive attribute) then fine I could deal with your viewpoint, but it's that very viewpoint that keeps you from action in dealing with situations in the real world, with real people and real issues.
It's like if I said, hey there's wolves eating our sheep, our food staple, and you say, "There has always been wolves, there will always be wolves, I'm going to pray that I won't feel pain when I lose a lamb, and be happy with the fact that it happens because it's exactly how it should happen in this just world." --then you go about your business happy as a clam.
So I have to go on my own and actually fight wolves with a stick because you're off in your own world praying to someone I don't think even exists, then getting a false sense of security and 'happiness' from it.

I can't see how it's a disadvantage in any way, to see life as it is rather than what it would be if there was a bigger sense of justice at work. I see injustice and want to figure out why it happened and stop it--you see injustice and think it's just a part of what we have to deal with in life but it will indeed be rectified not in this life. You might not have to worry about it then, but it doesn't change the fact that there was an injustice done, and the fact that you don't want to deal with it by giving your accountability up to god.

Quote:I'm not saying it's impossible for you to know happiness. I'm saying the bigger picture is bleak ... because you can't reason beyond the ultimate fact of injustice which over arches your world view.

I'm going to say that your sense of happiness is false, because you can't reason beyond the ultimate presence of a justice not of this earth, which over arches your entire world view and negates any reasoning for rectifying the situation in this life because you believe without evidence that there's justice in the next life.
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!

Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.

Dead wrong.  The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.

Quote:Some people deserve hell.

I say again:  No exceptions.  Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it.  As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.

[Image: tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif]
Reply
Re: The logical consequences of omnipotence
No point to make then.
Reply
RE: The logical consequences of omnipotence
If you don't have anything of value to contribute, you should consider fucking off.
Reply
RE: The logical consequences of omnipotence
(January 28, 2013 at 11:27 am)missluckie26 Wrote: typical non answer to a question not asked in the face of a valid point

Well, he's right. Thinking

(January 29, 2013 at 4:45 pm)Ryantology Wrote: If you don't have anything of value to contribute, you should consider fucking off.

Maybe you should have told yourself that back when he was posting things of value FSM Grin
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
Reply
RE: The logical consequences of omnipotence
(January 26, 2013 at 7:49 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:
(January 26, 2013 at 3:31 pm)Cinjin Wrote: For me the fact that he is not all-knowing and omnipotent only serves to further unmask the story.
You know that your logic fails badly right. That's OK then. Carry on Wink

lol
You're hardly the one to be judging logic Frodo. lol - The very idea of you condemning me on those grounds is absurd. But hey, carry on.
[Image: Evolution.png]

Reply
RE: The logical consequences of omnipotence
No matter how one attempts to work out this issue, the crux of christianity is God's perfection. A perfect deity has to be omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent, as most christians I've spoken to have a habit of declaring, and for him to be perfect this is true. With this comes questions as to the absurdity that reality could possibly have been created by such a creature, unless it's all a cosmic joke and said god has a very twisted sense of humour.

If God is not omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent, then he's fallible, which means that his laws and manner by which he supposedly governs the universe are fallible and liable to interpretation, which means that the bible's laws can be subject to scrutiny and rational processing, which lets face it, we already do. We don't enslave people anymore, we don't stone children to death when they misbehave, we don't force rapists to marry their victims, we don't sacrifice people and animals to imaginary people int he sky.

To be perfect, God must be capable of everything, or be nothing.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  "Hate the sin, not the sinner" is such a logical fallacy Woah0 7 1251 September 7, 2022 at 4:24 am
Last Post: Belacqua
  The absurd need for logical proofs for God R00tKiT 225 20800 December 31, 2020 at 7:48 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Logical proof that God doesnt exist. Macoleco 5 2857 November 24, 2016 at 2:47 am
Last Post: ProgrammingGodJordan
  More insight into religion: logical and emotional beliefs robvalue 22 4139 August 16, 2016 at 10:13 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Atheists Have the Most Logical Reason for being Moral Rhondazvous 24 8081 January 22, 2016 at 6:49 pm
Last Post: Reforged
  Why logical arguments for Messengers don't work. Mystic 45 12720 January 6, 2016 at 2:40 am
Last Post: robvalue
  What logical fallacies are William Lane Craig's favorite? Lemonvariable72 19 8383 November 5, 2013 at 10:58 pm
Last Post: Clueless Morgan
  the logical fallacies of religion and false arguments Nightfoot92 5 4303 September 15, 2013 at 1:27 pm
Last Post: Walking Void
  Top Logical Fallacies Used By Religion Meylis Delano Lawrence 12 7667 July 21, 2013 at 11:41 pm
Last Post: Michael Schubert
  Religions and Prayer, The Scientific Method, and Logical Holes Michael Schubert 2 2117 July 17, 2013 at 3:17 pm
Last Post: Michael Schubert



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)