Atheist Idicoy

[Something completely different]

Response: Sphincter responds?

What is it with muslims and their fixation with things that are conected to the human or animal anus?

[Al-Fatihah]

Response: Nope. Try again.

I do. The flu that effects us this year is the evolved version of what effected us last year. It simply evoves into a slightly different version and last years vaccine doesn't work.

There's a similar story about why we're having such a difficult time treating AIDS: we treat the virus and the virus just evolves into something that our current treatment won't stop. In fact, that's the reason HIV+ people get a medication coctail: each medication targets a specific aspect of the HIV virus so that if it evolves to get around one of the medications, the other two will still stop it.

MRSA comes from a similar place. Bacteria has evolved to the point that antibiotics aren't stopping them anymore and we're having to find new ways to treat infections because of it.

And the key, as has been shown to you in post after post after post in this thread, is that these findings can be found in a laboratory. Give me the resources and I could repeat them for you or, hell, I could show you how to repeat them yourself.

But here's the big question: How much faith do you really have in your dogma? How certain are you, really, that evolution doesn't happen? Are you willing to risk your life because of your faith that evolution didn't happen? I'm sure a strict theist like yourself trusts your dogma much more than modern medical science, right? Like, you aren't going to bother getting a flu shot every year because evolution is a lie and you can just rely on last years' shot. And one drug will stop HIV because there's no way it can evolve to get around that drug, right? And bacteria, there's no way for it to evolve to get around antibiotics, right? So if you get MRSA, you're just going to take the same antibiotics because, hey, they'll work since the bacteria didn't evolve, right?

Response: And where did you get that from?

A book.

And how do you know the book is true.

Because it says so.

Thus confirming the idiocy of atheism. Thanks for the clarification.

---

Response: Sphincter responds?

What is it with muslims and their fixation with things that are conected to the human or animal anus?

Response: Says the self-proclaimed sphincter.

[TaraJo]

Response: In other words, you can't defend the idiocy of atheism so you bring up islam. Thanks for the clarification.

Well, yeah, that's kinda how it works. Islam is the one making a claim. Correct me if I'm wrong, but you're the one who says there is no god but Allah and Mohammed is his prophet. All it means if someone claims to be an atheist is that we respond with "I don't think so." Pretty much, that's all an atheist is: someone who believes in one less god than you do. The same way you view the gods of Hinduism, Christianity and other faiths, that's how we see Allah.

[Something completely different]

Response: And where did you get that from?

A book.

And how do you know the book is true.

Because it says so.

Thus confirming the idiocy of atheism. Thanks for the clarification.

Response: And where did you get that from?

A koran.

And how do you know the koran is true.

Because it says so.

Thus confirming the idiocy of islam. Thanks for the clarification.

[paulpablo]

Your stating to get all your information from a book is idiotic every single pierce of information that muslims believe in is only related to books and nothing more

[TaraJo]

Response: And where did you get that from?

A book.

And how do you know the book is true.

Because it says so.

Thus confirming the idiocy of atheism. Thanks for the clarification.

No, I know this is true because I've done the tests in a lab. I've looked in microscopes and seen the changes. Have you ever observed Allah or Mohammed? Or are you just relying on a book?

You never answered my question, though: Much of modern medicine is based on evolution. Are you going to refuse treatment for something like MRSA or HIV because you know bacteria or viruses can't evolve?

[Something completely different]

Response: Says the self-proclaimed sphincter.

I have so far proclaimed nothing on this forum other than my natural German urgde to be the supreme ruler of the world.


You on the other hand proclaimed yourself a supporter of childsex.

And you cannot argue.


Frankly I am revolted by you and first didnt know how to handle you and your disgusting existance.


But at least I can still try to annoy the piss out of you.

[Al-Fatihah]

The arguments presented by Atheists are so illogical and hypocritical, that it's hard to imagine whether they are sane or not.

For example?

An atheist will deny or reject the teachings in religious scriptures and say that they are unsound or false because religious scriptures are made up of folklore and myths. They also state that saying a religious scripture is true because it says it's true is faulty logic.

Saying ANYTHING that is written is true because it says it is true is faulty logic.

But watch this. Ask any atheist about evoultion and what is there proof? They themselves refer to textbooks themselves as proof and claim that evolution is true for the same reasons why religious call their scriptures true. "Because it says so". That shows not only complete hypocrisy, but refutes the claim that evolution is true because according to atheists themselves, claiming something is true because it says it's true is faulty logic.

We don't only refer to textbooks. We can refer you to the papers they're based on. We can refer you to the scientists who did the work. We can direct you to fossil dig sites, genetic laboratories, and botanical and zoological fieldwork. The only thing we can't do is understand it for you.

It doesn't end there though. To defend that foolish claim, they say that it's not based on say so. They say that the science has been peer-reviewed, analyzed, and witnessed, observed and tested, so it's a fact.

That doesn't make it a fact, just well-supported. What makes it a fact is the accumulated evidence of well over a century.

But watch this. How do you know that it's been witnessed, peer-reviewed, and analyzed, observed and tested? "Because it says so". Hahah. They defend their faulty logic with the same faulty logic.

We have years of accumulated posts here. I dare you to find one where an atheist says they know the evidence has been witnessed, peer-reviewed, and analyzed, observed and tested 'because the source says so'. And EVEN if you found a profoundly stupid atheist to say something like that, it's still faulty logic, and it still applies to religious texts: a source saying it's true doesn't make it true.

Therefore, since all atheist claims and alleged evidence that evolution is true or God does not or may not exist is based on "because a book says so" and cannot even present evidence that the authors are speaking truthfully, then they have no logical reasoning to deny any religious scripture as truth when it's based on the same type of evidence for evolution as true, which is, "because a book says so".

Lots of theists accept the evidence that evolution is true, it's not an atheist theory, it's a scientific theory. However, if every atheist believed in it for illogical reasons, it wouldn't make believing the words of a religious text are true because they say they are, logical. It would just mean we're abusing logic as badly as you are.

The idiocy of atheists exposed.

At least you spelled 'idiocy' correctly that time.

Response: Your own words:

Saying ANYTHING that is written is true because it says it is true is faulty logic.

Thus confirming the idiocy of atheism. Thanks for the confirmation.

[Surtr]

The difference between our books and your books is that ours provide observable evidence that has been confirmed and tested hundreds of times, while yours are made up of baseless claims that you blindly accept as truth.

---

Saying ANYTHING that is written is true because it says it is true is faulty logic.

Thus confirming the idiocy of atheism. Thanks for the confirmation.

Oh god, the irony....

[Al-Fatihah]

No, I know this is true because I've done the tests in a lab. I've looked in microscopes and seen the changes. Have you ever observed Allah or Mohammed? Or are you just relying on a book?

You never answered my question, though: Much of modern medicine is based on evolution. Are you going to refuse treatment for something like MRSA or HIV because you know bacteria or viruses can't evolve?
[/quote]

Response: Then if evolution is true based on you claiming to observed it in a lab, then according to your logic, Big Foot exists and Tupac is still alive, because people claim to have seen them as well. So unless you accept that they exist as well, then according to your own logic, your evidence is fasle, thus evolution is false.