Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 12, 2026, 7:01 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Something that can strengthen the cosmological argument?
#1
Something that can strengthen the cosmological argument?
This would not be a definitive proof, but what if someone reasoned, given the nature of all moments of time is to preceded by a moment of time, an exception to the rule, which is necessary if time is finite, would imply something outside the natural state of the universe is more likely to have caused it, then for it to stop at time zero with no reason at all?

Also, "why now now" is usually answered because of time before it, but at time zero, there is a "now now" which is just mysteriously there with no precedence. Now something outside time seems more likely, then simply, "well there is no north to north pole" reasoning.

Thoughts?
Reply
#2
RE: Something that can strengthen the cosmological argument?
(April 8, 2013 at 5:59 am)MysticKnight Wrote: This would not be a definitive proof, but what if someone reasoned, given the nature of all moments of time is to preceded by a moment of time, an exception to the rule, which is necessary if time is finite, would imply something outside the natural state of the universe is more likely to have caused it, then for it to stop at time zero with no reason at all?

Also, "why now now" is usually answered because of time before it, but at time zero, there is a "now now" which is just mysteriously there with no precedence. Now something outside time seems more likely, then simply, "well there is no north to north pole" reasoning.

Thoughts?

This is an interesting issue. If all reference frames have to yield the same results, same principles of physics, then the reference frame of photons must also work. From the time frame of the photon there is no time between emission from one atom and absorption by another. In that sense atoms from the first light of cosmic background radiation connects the atoms in our sensors that measure it today.

Also, ignoring time, where did the big bang occur. It occured in all existing space today. The points are only separated because of time.
Atoms are connected by photons in the first case but have to be separated in time in the second. And both reference frames have to result in the same physics.

I am still working on it, including on how to phrase the issue before trying to answer it. So far I think time is a local dimension and the four continuous dimensions of the universe are x,y,z and entropy.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  An Argument Against Determinism Disagreeable 32 4903 March 13, 2026 at 9:11 pm
Last Post: Disagreeable
  The Kalam Cosmological Argument Disagreeable 123 30065 December 15, 2024 at 6:11 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Everything, Something's or Nothing Lord Andreasson 28 6895 October 4, 2024 at 2:48 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The classic ontological argument Modern Atheism 20 4848 October 3, 2024 at 12:45 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The modal ontological argument for God Disagreeable 29 7287 August 10, 2024 at 8:57 pm
Last Post: MetisX
  Is CS a science or engineering, or maybe something else? FlatAssembler 90 24077 November 6, 2023 at 7:48 am
Last Post: FlatAssembler
  The Cosmological Proof LinuxGal 53 15213 September 24, 2023 at 12:24 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  The argument from degree LinuxGal 9 2565 January 1, 2023 at 12:14 am
Last Post: The Architect Of Fate
  Veridican Argument for the Existence of God The Veridican 14 5313 January 16, 2022 at 4:48 pm
Last Post: brewer
  [Serious] An Argument Against Hedonistic Moral Realism SenseMaker007 25 7467 June 19, 2019 at 7:21 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)