Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 5:55 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Senate rejects Background Check (for Firearm Purchase) Bill
#1
Senate rejects Background Check (for Firearm Purchase) Bill
ronedee Wrote:Science doesn't have a good explaination for water

[Image: YAAgdMk.gif]



Reply
#2
RE: Senate rejects Background Check (for Firearm Purchase) Bill
Quote:Added Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky: "The government shouldn't punish or harass law-abiding citizens in the exercise of their Second Amendment rights."

Facepalm And how do we know that they're law abiding citizens (and not downright insane) without the background checks?
Reply
#3
RE: Senate rejects Background Check (for Firearm Purchase) Bill
Reply
#4
RE: Senate rejects Background Check (for Firearm Purchase) Bill
To be fair, the only good argument I have heard against this is that states should handle this problem themselves. I'm not anti-gun, but I do believe background checks should be necessary. I just wish we could handle it on a state level because I do not like the feds having too much power. It pisses me off.
Reply
#5
RE: Senate rejects Background Check (for Firearm Purchase) Bill
The states are even worse, Shel.

Look at the collection of republicunts running the deep south.
Reply
#6
RE: Senate rejects Background Check (for Firearm Purchase) Bill
We have to get a license to drive a fucking car. But maybe this just be a way for the government to find out who has/wants a car. They be coming for my Chevy next! Telling me I cant hoard gasoline and such.
Stand before the people you fear and speak your mind - even if your voice shakes.
Maggie Kuhn
Reply
#7
RE: Senate rejects Background Check (for Firearm Purchase) Bill
Actually, the bill was rejected for more reasons than just the background check. It was the other shit that was in the bill that the senators, the NRA, and people in general had a hard time swallowing. Capacity limitations, auto-fire/assault bans, legality issues for transferring firearms...this isn't shit 90% of the population agree on. If they had just gone for the background checks and not the typical ultraliberal overregulation shit on top of it this bill would have passed and everyone would be happier but Obama had to make a big giant political statement, he fucked up, and now we're all left feeling like we just lost, because, really, we did. >:/
Reply
#8
RE: Senate rejects Background Check (for Firearm Purchase) Bill
To be fair, states and the federal government already require background checks. The background check issue is a loophole of person-person "private" transactions. The federal background checks required of licensed dealers (who the fuck buys a rifle from billybob anyway...godamned rednecks, don't even go in for the quality gear........) are pretty thoroughly enforced - insomuch as they can be, the state bacground checks are much more lax, and overall even licensed dealers like to go the gun shows and make "private transactions".

I think that this one should be isolated and put up for the vote as well, without any baggage that might weigh it down and delay the loophole being closed. I think the system in place trikes a fair balance. They run the check, they keep the check on file for a set period of time, then they discard the record/file it away (so as to avoid making a "list of gun owners"). If you don't give a politician anything else to point at as a screen for activities performed at the behest of his owners it makes pointing the finger a whole hell of alot easier.

(I never understood the capacity thing - in the service we just taped magazines opposite ends to make reloading faster, you just pull down, flip, reinsert. The capacity of the magazine is entirely irrelevant as this takes -maybe- a second to accomplish. But hey, the entire assault rifle thing is something I don't understand, so meh)
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#9
RE: Senate rejects Background Check (for Firearm Purchase) Bill
(April 18, 2013 at 7:09 am)Creed of Heresy Wrote: Actually, the bill was rejected for more reasons than just the background check. It was the other shit that was in the bill that the senators, the NRA, and people in general had a hard time swallowing. Capacity limitations, auto-fire/assault bans, legality issues for transferring firearms...this isn't shit 90% of the population agree on. If they had just gone for the background checks and not the typical ultraliberal overregulation shit on top of it this bill would have passed and everyone would be happier but Obama had to make a big giant political statement, he fucked up, and now we're all left feeling like we just lost, because, really, we did. >:/
Quote:Actually, the bill was rejected for more reasons than just the background check. It was the other shit that was in the bill that the senators, the NRA, and people in general had a hard time swallowing. Capacity limitations, auto-fire/assault bans, legality issues for transferring firearms...this isn't shit 90% of the population agree on. If they had just gone for the background checks and not the typical ultraliberal overregulation shit on top of it this bill would have passed...
YUP...Barack and his far-left buddies were overly anxious...
"Inside every Liberal there's a Totalitarian screaming to get out"

[Image: freddy_03.jpg]

Quote: JohnDG...
Quote:It was an awful mistake to characterize based upon religion. I should not judge any theist that way, I must remember what I said in order to change.
Reply
#10
RE: Senate rejects Background Check (for Firearm Purchase) Bill
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Bill Clinton and Ukraine Interaktive 4 1429 August 5, 2022 at 1:23 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  TX social media censorship bill Fake Messiah 24 6799 September 14, 2021 at 3:15 pm
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Crypto bill paulpablo 31 8538 August 19, 2021 at 8:40 am
Last Post: Spongebob
  Senate Trial has started. Jackie 95 21618 February 15, 2021 at 7:22 am
Last Post: awty
  Az Lawmaker introduces scary bill. Jackie 40 11577 February 1, 2021 at 10:29 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  I got a Stimulus check. Jackie 51 13369 August 5, 2020 at 1:19 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Equal pay for women's soccer or no Fed funding bill brewer 55 14074 August 4, 2019 at 7:25 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Rabid Republicans in Oregon senate Rev. Rye 5 1709 June 22, 2019 at 9:58 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Maybe Putin Will Write A Check? Minimalist 0 730 October 13, 2018 at 11:44 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Use this to check your irony meter. Gawdzilla Sama 5 1564 August 6, 2018 at 12:07 am
Last Post: Cecelia



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)