How to shut up people who are against abortion

[smax]

[quote='smax' pid='453609' dateline='1370065339']On what basis do you claim to be a "Christian"?

I don't, now you.

[catfish]

[quote='smax' pid='453609' dateline='1370065339']On what basis do you claim to be a "Christian"?

I don't, now you.

Do you think fucking up the quote tags makes that question come from me? Use some of the really real realistist shit and fix your error.

I don't think you're capable man, take a breather and check your position again.
.

[fr0d0]

So you agree with me?

I wouldn't say that at all. Unless you were somehow conceding that god doesn't care one way or the other for human life?

I never mentioned God. You did. So let me work out what you're saying, as you seem to be incapable: Science doesn't care if human life exists or not.

I take it from that that you have no objection to my point that science states that a person exists from conception.

---

Why bring up God?

Why bring up god in a thread about god's lack of regard for human life?

Hmmmmm.....

I'm (continuing) answering you directly regarding the thread title, which, as pointed out by others, doesn't mention god. So far I see zero reason to add him to the equation.

I could engage you on your deliberate ignorance, but that would be to change the subject. Do you think your argument is already lost? is that why you want to change the subject?

I'm participating here because you invited me to present my reasoning. I obliged and now you're dodging.

[CriticalBen]

Abortion is wrong and right. It is wrong because some people choose to have sex without protection for stupid reasons; but some people are raped and forced to have sex. Should that person spend the rest of her life raising a kid she didn't even want? That would be bad, both for the woman and the kid.

Either you allow only those whom have been forced to have sex to do abortion, or you don't to anything. Simple as that.

[NoraBrimstone]

What the fuck is this idea that a woman having unprotected sex is a crime worthy of a life sentence? The mysogeny is fucking sickening.

[fr0d0]

Haha! Nature is mysogenistic now. lol.

[smax]

I don't, now you.

Do you think fucking up the quote tags makes that question come from me? Use some of the really real realistist shit and fix your error.

I don't think you're capable man, take a breather and check your position again.
.

LOL @ you getting you getting pissed off.

That's okay, don't answer the question. I'm satisfied that I already have the answer.

[Creed of Heresy]

...Still waiting for that scientific proof you mentioned, Frodo. *checks watch*

[NoraBrimstone]

Haha! Nature is mysogenistic now. lol.

Yes, because nature is a fucking conscious being capable of mysogeny.

[smax]

I never mentioned God. You did. So let me work out what you're saying, as you seem to be incapable: Science doesn't care if human life exists or not.

The thread is about god. So every time you ignore that fact you are deflecting, which is very interesting.

Are you, in your own way, admitting that your position here isn't consistent with the actions of god?

Last chance to answer. One more deflection, and I'll assume the answer is yes.

I take it from that that you have no objection to my point that science states that a person exists from conception.

You took it wrong. My position is that science doesn't regard human life.

However, if you can reasonably demonstrate that the scientific view is that conception is the beginning of life, I have no problem acknowledging it.

Even if you do, however, it will not help you to refute the point of this thread, which is that the Bible has little to no regard for human life.

That is the subject matter.

I'm (continuing) answering you directly regarding the thread title, which, as pointed out by others, doesn't mention god. So far I see zero reason to add him to the equation.

I could engage you on your deliberate ignorance, but that would be to change the subject. Do you think your argument is already lost? is that why you want to change the subject?

I'm participating here because you invited me to present my reasoning. I obliged and now you're dodging.

That's not what's happening at all. The OP clearly demonstrated a gross contradiction within the Christian faith regarding the value of human life. It was in big letters, you couldn't miss it.

Instead of addressing that issue, Christians simply went right into their pro life arguments.

Even worse, you have basically proven the stereotype that Christians simply bury their heads in the sand when it comes to the moral implications of their religious doctrine.

So, are you going to address that issue or continue in ignorance?