Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 3:26 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ku Klux Kourt Kills King's Dream Law
#1
Ku Klux Kourt Kills King's Dream Law
Reply
#2
RE: Ku Klux Kourt Kills King's Dream Law
It is scary about the right's mad rush to put the cat back in the bag now that they are being exposed as the nuts they are, they have to cheat and lie to win. But believe me, just like blacks were underestimated back then, and just like progressives of all colors put Obama in the White House TWICE, I think they are making the same stupid mistake they always make, instead of progressing forward, these morons cling to an outdated and bigoted past.

The right has had a successful push for the past 50 years, but now they know it isn't fooling anyone anymore and this decision will not hold progress back for long. 5-4 really is not a slam dunk in any case and makes it easier for future courts to reverse.

This is merely a hiccup and one that will keep the fire of progress on the move.
Reply
#3
RE: Ku Klux Kourt Kills King's Dream Law
Reply
#4
RE: Ku Klux Kourt Kills King's Dream Law
Quote:The court upheld the constitutionality of the preclearance provision


Um, what they did is tell you that you can fuck a supermodel and then cut your balls off.

Do you really think such legislation will get through this particular bunch of nazi fucknuts in the House?
Reply
#5
RE: Ku Klux Kourt Kills King's Dream Law
"In theory" you can buy a car but it does you no good not to have gas in it. While it does not gut the "oversight" part of the law, it does deem the oversight location institutions unconstitutional. So basically you are removing the gas from the car, which makes it literally open season on voting rights.

Or like Minimalist said "fuck a super model and then cut your balls off".

5-4 has been a relatively constant split over the past couple of decades especially on social issues. But to claim that the majority was "fair" about it is bullshit, the truth of this reversal on 40 years of law is told by minority judge in Ruth Ginsburg who called the decision "demolition".

So claiming it was split and fair would be like saying "Yea we left the building mostly in tact, but we weakened the main pillars"
Reply
#6
RE: Ku Klux Kourt Kills King's Dream Law
(June 25, 2013 at 9:23 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Um, what they did is tell you that you can fuck a supermodel and then cut your balls off.
I think a better analogy would be that they told Congress to no longer shit on the lawn because we now have indoor plumbing.

Quote:Do you really think such legislation will get through this particular bunch of nazi fucknuts in the House?

Yes, without much difficulty if handled properly. The relative silence of Republican lawmakers after the decision is almost deafening, and telling. Nobody wants to be on the wrong side of this. In addition, it's a perfect opportunity for party leadership to provide an example that the entire lot can actually do something productive.

Reid, McConnell, Durbin, Cornyn, Boehner, Pelosi, Cantor, McCarthy and Hoyer should clear their schedules and lock themselves in a room tomorrow with the goal of having a joint press conference in the afternoon to address the ruling and communicate a plan of action.

The action should be limited to providing an updated formula, that's it. No amendments that attempt to address some other provision of the VRA should be allowed. No extraneous non-VRA bullshit either.
Reply
#7
RE: Ku Klux Kourt Kills King's Dream Law
I do not intend to hold my breath waiting.

They republicunts have spent the last 3 years trying to disenfranchise minority voters. The court just handed them a great big present. Don't expect them to take it to the "returns" counter.
Reply
#8
RE: Ku Klux Kourt Kills King's Dream Law
Quote:I think a better analogy would be that they told Congress to no longer shit on the lawn because we now have indoor plumbing.

Shitting on the lawn? So that is what the original voting rights act was? Shitting on the lawn? Wow.
Reply
#9
RE: Ku Klux Kourt Kills King's Dream Law
(June 25, 2013 at 10:41 pm)Brian37 Wrote: "In theory" you can buy a car but it does you no good not to have gas in it.

To further expand on you car analogy, yes they took the gas out. But if anything it's because the gas in the car is not good enough for the engine. We can put better gas in the car.

The data that was being used for the formulas was outdated. They need to update the law.
Reply
#10
RE: Ku Klux Kourt Kills King's Dream Law
(June 25, 2013 at 10:52 pm)plaincents822 Wrote:
(June 25, 2013 at 10:41 pm)Brian37 Wrote: "In theory" you can buy a car but it does you no good not to have gas in it.

To further expand on you car analogy, yes they took the gas out. But if anything it's because the gas in the car is not good enough for the engine. We can put better gas in the car.

The data that was being used for the formulas was outdated. They need to update the law.

Bullshit, you'd have me believe a republican party which has favored corporate America, has fucked workers rights over, has bowed to global corporatism, has attacked female control over reproductive rights and be trusted with voting rights considering they constantly over the past few years have mass produced voter ID laws and attempts to ban early voting and gerrymandered on a mafia scale, whose mantra since Obama's first election made their goal to prevent him from getting a second term, and announced so even before his first Inauguration.

You'd have me believe they have voters rights in our interest? No this is not Teddy Roosevelt's republican party, it isn't even Reagan's republican party, this current bunch is a throwback to pre civil war era where only white rich guys had any rights. They are the bat shit crazy party.

Do you think Judge Ginsburg who has spent her life studying case law and precedence called the majority's decision "demolition" for nothing?
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The hearings and a matter of law. Jackie 0 914 June 29, 2022 at 9:35 am
Last Post: Jackie
  Texas Law could circumvent Roe V. Wade Cecelia 55 14475 September 29, 2021 at 3:50 pm
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  LAW and CIVILIZATION senorlegalo 64 16761 January 19, 2021 at 3:11 pm
Last Post: awty
  [Serious] What's the point? Trump and the GOP are clearly above the law no matter what you say GODZILLA 21 8076 May 21, 2019 at 10:46 am
Last Post: Jackie
  "The American Dream" is just a myth we tell ourselves Kitan Etos 45 13904 April 20, 2019 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: EgoDeath
  Saudi Arabia: the King has Alzehimer; forgetting words in front of camera WinterHold 27 8247 February 28, 2019 at 6:37 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Why does comb over Mussolini think he's king with unlimited powers? GODZILLA 9 2385 November 29, 2018 at 4:54 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Anti Trans Bathroom Law Proganada is Kind Of Misandrist Amarok 30 9115 March 7, 2018 at 11:03 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Athiestforum.org is a terrorist hole; accrding to new Saudi law. Human Rights Watch WinterHold 16 7033 November 24, 2017 at 5:51 pm
Last Post: Jackie
  What Is This All Men Are Equal Under The Law Shit? Minimalist 10 5477 May 24, 2017 at 4:47 pm
Last Post: NuclearEnergy



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)