(September 4, 2013 at 10:12 am)enrico Wrote:(September 4, 2013 at 9:07 am)Stimbo Wrote: This is beyond stupid. This is a level of sub-stupid that can only be attained by devoting a decade to learning everything there is to know about a subject, then physically hacking the knowledge out of your brain with a rusty chisel dipped in LSD and replacing it with a phial of 100% proof liquid stupidity. You then take the removed parts of your brain that held the knowledge, place them by a large boulder, and spend thirty years gnawing the boulder into the shape of the word “stupidity.” Finally you flip the boulder of stupidity onto the scraps of brain using a JCB with the registration “Stup1d” and propelled by fossil fuels culled from mentally handicapped dinosaurs.
Then you manage to reverse the vehicle over yourself as a final testament to your stupidity.
No. Just no. The operative word in your statement is "if". It's the single most overworked word in the theists' language. Now follow it through with "if not" - complete the analysis. Then ask yourself why I opted to phrase my comment the way I did. (Hint: I may have been taking the piss.)
Irony is not your favorite dish Stimbo.
How sad!
That wasn't irony. You continue to demonstrate your stupidity.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.