A small thanks to the resident Theists..

[catfish]

My only regret is the fishy odor that remains in my leather seats.

What, you're not ashamed of how you looked like an uneducated, childish fool?
That's what now? Three times you've made an ass of yourself and ran from a direct challenge?

As for your dumbass not remembering disagreeing...

She already gave proof, but you failed to see it. It's your own problem if you don't want to believe her, but it makes you look like a dumbass for asking such an asinine question.

So which is it? Is she off the hook for her burden of proof or not?

[Minimalist]

Tell me something, why do you keep bring up these above ^ verses I've already explained and no one has argued the explanation.

Excuse me but I've told you that you are full of shit everytime you try to pull the "it doesn't mean what it fucking says" routine.

You are such a bullshit artist, G-C.

[Mystical]

[Bad Writer]

[Mystical]

Lol prolly not. He's stuck on the mistranslation of Aeonian to justify his god as not being a megalomaniac asshole. As far as I can ascertain from a good 8mo of observation of his majority of snide remarks, Catfish is a non conformist Christian. (correct me if I'm wrong, Catifsh. You're hard to pin down on anything.)

[catfish]

Lol prolly not. He's stuck on the mistranslation of Aeonian to justify his god as not being a megalomaniac asshole. As far as I can ascertain from a good 8mo of observation of his majority of snide remarks, Catfish is a non conformist Christian. (correct me if I'm wrong, Catifsh. You're hard to pin down on anything.)

Wow, you really have no clue about anything, huh?
1st, I am the one who pointed out to you that "eonian" means an indeterminate period of time, so I don't know where you came up with that.
2nd, this is about your claim to have read the Bible and that it says it is unerring and that it is a requirement to follow it.
3rd, you keep harping about punishment being unfair? Who are you, dazzn or Koolay or something???
4th, I'm going to laugh because your opening paragraph about God not being eternal was hillarious as Romans 1:20 was the same verse that I had refered to when I told you that there was a Greek word used in the NT which does mean "eternal". Go check if you don't believe me.

[Mystical]

I don't understand any of your qualms, Catfish. I said you think Aeonian means indeterminate not eternal.
I stated in my first paragraph how there was a word referenced in describing god as Aeonian. I then went on to say that if
god was described as such and he's supposedly eternal, then the rest of the translated references would also have to mean eternal.
Since they obviously do not (in describing Jonah's fish experience and such), then either god is not eternal or he is and everything else does
mean eternal (like HELL).
No, sir. Who do you think You are, to assign a judgement upon me (indeterminate or not)when I've done nothing to deserve such treatment? A judgement your own brethren hold to be eternal torment in hell. My life would be a lot better off not even knowing about your silly viewpoint, honestly. Instead, here you are on an atheist forum telling me that oh I'm only going to hell for an indeterminate amount of time. Seriously, go suck a big one catfish.

---

OH! AND you're a Waste Of Breath. Your two sentence replies to a half hours+ worth of work? FUCK OFF TROLL.

[Heir Apparent]

Oh man, I leave this thread for a few hours and come back to a bad troll, GC trying (and failing) to defend his crappy book, and a hell that has broken loose.

I like it here.

Please show me I'm wrong and I don't see you defending what you believe. I've offered to explain those verses even though I know most will reject what I say.

GC

Surely that's already been done by 3-4 people already, probably more. I don't need to parrot what they've said already.

And I don't see my beliefs being challenged. Would you like to?

[Captain Colostomy]

No, sir. Who do you think You are...

Why, he's an arsonist, lighting fires to watch the flames. Heck, even when he may have a point, he withholds his full thoughts on the subject at hand to allow others to twist in the wind. That way, he can swoop in with triumphant 'nuh-uhs', 'you are wrongs', and ad hominems. In a discussion and/or debate between multiple parties, I find this close to the vest approach to exchanging ideas damnable.

FUCK OFF TROLL.

This.

[Walking Void]

Who do you think You are...

And where did they get that car?

There they go...

The boys in the bright white sports car.