Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 14, 2024, 3:55 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
#11
Re: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
Bacteria can do things we can't. Is that "upward evolution" too?
[Image: giphy.gif]
Reply
#12
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
(October 4, 2013 at 9:20 am)TheBeardedDude Wrote: What is "upward evolution"?

It's the opposite of downward evolution, silly.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Reply
#13
Re: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
Does that mean gravity is evolution?
[Image: giphy.gif]
Reply
#14
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
(October 4, 2013 at 9:32 am)TheBeardedDude Wrote: Bacteria can do things we can't. Is that "upward evolution" too?

But the current types of bacteria would still be more advanced than the original bacteria. So they are advanced bacteria. That also would be upward evolution.
Reply
#15
Re: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
How so? Please demonstrate how the primitive archaea that are still around are more advanced than their ancestors.

Is it "upward evolution" when traits are lost? Like say, sight in bats?
[Image: giphy.gif]
Reply
#16
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
(October 4, 2013 at 9:33 am)TheBeardedDude Wrote: Does that mean gravity is evolution?

I don't know. Let's ask SBGTF to ask Jesus for us.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Reply
#17
Re: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
Also, you ever going to go back to those other threads and answer my questions?
[Image: giphy.gif]
Reply
#18
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
(October 4, 2013 at 9:38 am)TheBeardedDude Wrote: How so? Please demonstrate how the primitive archaea that are still around are more advanced than their ancestors.

If the first one was more advanced than current bacteria, the abiogenesis is really preposterous.

I am almost positive that almost all scientist would agree that the primitive bacteria was not as advanced as the current bacteria.
Reply
#19
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
(October 4, 2013 at 9:22 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:
(October 4, 2013 at 9:20 am)TheBeardedDude Wrote: What is "upward evolution"?

From a bacteria that cannot do things like man can.

For example, invent calculus, play baseball, paint the night sky, write a book, etc.

It has already been explained to you that there is no "upward evolution" in the sense that evolution is teleological. There is no goal, no purpose. Your insistence on using that phrase is of a piece with your equally dim-witted use of "atheistic origin science."

Again and again, you run your ignorance of science up a flagpole for all to see. Why don't you listen to what people tell you? There are actual scientists on this site who have generously given of their time to try to help you understand how badly you've been hoodwinked by creationists, but you just carry on as if nothing happened. You are not only an idiot; you are an arrogant ingrate.

What are your qualifications that enable you to dismiss multiple disciplines including: genetics, microbiology, geology, paleontology, astronomy, cosmology, and others? How craven, corrupt, brain washed, and just plain butt-stupid do you intend to demonstrate yourself to be? Don't you have any pride at all?

Fucking cult members.
Reply
#20
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
(October 4, 2013 at 9:38 am)TheBeardedDude Wrote: How so? Please demonstrate how the primitive archaea that are still around are more advanced than their ancestors.

Is it "upward evolution" when traits are lost? Like say, sight in bats?

If the primitive archaea are still around, does that disprove evolution?
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  a theory about modern xtian deconversion drfuzzy 14 3255 April 29, 2016 at 1:12 am
Last Post: Godscreated
  You Can't Disprove a Miracle Rhondazvous 155 19820 March 18, 2016 at 11:05 am
Last Post: Cyberman
  Hi, I'm a Christian. Help Me Disprove My Religion! WishfulThinking 265 67369 October 11, 2015 at 9:20 am
Last Post: Cyberman
  Planet Bieber update: Justin debunks the big bang theory TubbyTubby 32 6900 October 1, 2015 at 5:52 pm
Last Post: Crossless2.0
  Debunking the "Dying and Rising Gods" Theory Randy Carson 55 17378 September 22, 2015 at 3:24 pm
Last Post: abaris
  Christians to die out by diminished gene pool theory (sub-species) TubbyTubby 20 3796 August 20, 2015 at 5:18 pm
Last Post: brewer
  DEBUNKING THE CONSPIRACY THEORY Randy Carson 230 49456 August 19, 2015 at 3:14 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Let's say the multiverse theory is true, how would a Christian insert God...? Mr. Moncrieff 21 7732 March 1, 2014 at 7:15 am
Last Post: Alex K
  The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely SavedByGraceThruFaith 216 66914 October 14, 2013 at 6:05 am
Last Post: Zen Badger
  Do you believe in the mythist theory ? viocjit 14 5407 June 4, 2013 at 2:51 am
Last Post: FifthElement



Users browsing this thread: 11 Guest(s)