Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
October 5, 2013 at 2:17 pm
(October 5, 2013 at 2:05 pm)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: That's a lot of creationist pieces.
Where else do you think an empty mind like Grace's would find such bilge?
LastPoet Wrote:The way I figure it, creationists envision evolution from Pokemon or X-men...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WFoT9oGtfc
This never happens, and therefore god! 
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 3837
Threads: 197
Joined: August 28, 2013
Reputation:
38
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
October 5, 2013 at 2:29 pm
(October 5, 2013 at 2:17 pm)Esquilax Wrote: (October 5, 2013 at 2:05 pm)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: That's a lot of creationist pieces.
Where else do you think an empty mind like Grace's would find such bilge? I don't know, I'm amazed he's YEC and yet managed to find his way on to the internet.
btw is saved by grace a him or her?
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Posts: 352
Threads: 8
Joined: September 29, 2013
Reputation:
1
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
October 5, 2013 at 2:40 pm
(October 5, 2013 at 1:50 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: (October 5, 2013 at 7:25 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:
SavedByGraceThruFaith
It has not gone unnoticed that you have not responded to any of Zazzy's posts to you.
Why is that? He's a biologist that just wants to educate you with actual science.
Is your faith that weak?
Well let Zazzy actually refute with real facts.
Remember most biologists are blinded by a false assumption of no God in the origin issue.
Posts: 192
Threads: 2
Joined: September 23, 2013
Reputation:
4
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
October 5, 2013 at 2:43 pm
(This post was last modified: October 5, 2013 at 2:43 pm by Airyaman.)
(October 5, 2013 at 2:40 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: Well let Zazzy actually refute with real facts.
Remember most biologists are blinded by a false assumption of no God in the origin issue.
I asked this before when you said something similar, but will again since you didn't answer it: what do any gods have to do with scientific theories?
Posts: 3817
Threads: 5
Joined: November 19, 2012
Reputation:
54
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
October 5, 2013 at 2:45 pm
(October 5, 2013 at 2:40 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: (October 5, 2013 at 1:50 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: SavedByGraceThruFaith
It has not gone unnoticed that you have not responded to any of Zazzy's posts to you.
Why is that? He's a biologist that just wants to educate you with actual science.
Is your faith that weak?
Well let Zazzy actually refute with real facts.
Remember most biologists are blinded by a false assumption of no God in the origin issue.
No, there is simply no need to assume the existence of any gods.
And further, the Theory of Evolution disproves 'upward evolution'.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Posts: 352
Threads: 8
Joined: September 29, 2013
Reputation:
1
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
October 5, 2013 at 2:47 pm
(October 5, 2013 at 2:45 pm)Chas Wrote: (October 5, 2013 at 2:40 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: Well let Zazzy actually refute with real facts.
Remember most biologists are blinded by a false assumption of no God in the origin issue.
No, there is simply no need to assume the existence of any gods.
And further, the Theory of Evolution disproves 'upward evolution'.
So the first creature was the most advanced and complex creature that ever lived?
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
October 5, 2013 at 2:51 pm
(October 5, 2013 at 2:47 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: So the first creature was the most advanced and complex creature that ever lived?
No, but evolution isn't a continuous process of advancement, either. There's no "up" for it to go in. Example, as I've said before: whales are the descendants of early ungulates, land animals that returned to the sea and developed a marine form again. It's evidence in the bones of their flippers, along with the fact that they, well, breathe air.
Is this fact going to sink in, now?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 352
Threads: 8
Joined: September 29, 2013
Reputation:
1
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
October 5, 2013 at 2:56 pm
(October 5, 2013 at 2:51 pm)Esquilax Wrote: (October 5, 2013 at 2:47 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: So the first creature was the most advanced and complex creature that ever lived?
No, but evolution isn't a continuous process of advancement, either. There's no "up" for it to go in. Example, as I've said before: whales are the descendants of early ungulates, land animals that returned to the sea and developed a marine form again. It's evidence in the bones of their flippers, along with the fact that they, well, breathe air.
Is this fact going to sink in, now?
You were not there when these assumed events occurred.
So they are not facts.
Common design elements can also be used by the Creator.
You presented nothing that shows evolution over creation.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
October 5, 2013 at 2:59 pm
(This post was last modified: October 5, 2013 at 3:00 pm by Cyberman.)
Iro-nyyy!
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
October 5, 2013 at 3:03 pm
(October 5, 2013 at 2:56 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: You were not there when these assumed events occurred.
So they are not facts.
Common design elements can also be used by the Creator.
You presented nothing that shows evolution over creation.
Alright, let's play this game then, fuckwit: were you there when your god created the universe? No? Must not have happened, then.
Were you there when he created life? No? Didn't happen.
Were you there when you were conceived? Must not have happened. You don't exist.
Were you there when the bible was written? No? What bible? There's no such book!
Were you there when the christian church was formed? No? I guess you don't have a religion, then!
Congrats, Grace! You just disproved the entirety of your own religion and everyone else's! Pretty good work for someone who doesn't exist!
You know, there's a reason that we accept evidence and such in court, and not just witness testimony. It's because facts aren't dictated only by whether you were there to see them. But please, continue with this petty solipsism if you like; if you do, your own religion doesn't exist, and you'll just have been babbling incoherently this entire time, since you weren't around when the english language was developed.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
|
