Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.

[Ryantology]

my english teacher told us we couldn't use the phase in her classroom, "I don't think".

To judge by your spelling and capitalization, that's the point where you stopped paying attention in her class.

[Godscreated]

If you do not like what I have to say then quit reading my post, then you want be a frustrated dimwit.

GC

As expected, instead of explaining your idiotic posts, you make a pathetic attempt of going into the offensive.

Well, you ass, the way in which you spew your pathetic and brainless talkingpoints all across this forum makes it almoust impossible to ignore them. Which I actualy did until recently. Currently I am reading through them and trying to make out a case against you for breaking the forum rules against preaching.

Don't waste your time I do not preach here, you want me gone that bad, you are pathetic at best and something less than human in reality.

GC

[snowtracks]

that speculation is beyond human discovery. biblically we do know that God is not ushered along with the one-directional cause and effect defined cosmic timeline since He can compress or accelerated the time velocity of it, and can initiate a cause on it that's in the past. so by logical necessity He has access to at least one other time dim, and possibly access to a plane of time that would connote access to multiple time dim's.

Ok, and evidence for any of that please?

Have you got confirmation from your version of god directly that the above is correct (bracketing out the idea that evidence even exists for it)?

Otherwise it just kind of seems like you're making stuff up.

the U. is an effect. Therefore the casual agent existed 'before' the cosmic time line that began with U.. So at least 2 dims of time exist and the non-cosmic time can be intersected at any point along the U. timeline.

[Jackalope]

Ok, and evidence for any of that please?

Have you got confirmation from your version of god directly that the above is correct (bracketing out the idea that evidence even exists for it)?

Otherwise it just kind of seems like you're making stuff up.

the U. is an effect. Therefore the casual agent existed 'before' the cosmic time line that began with U.. So at least 2 dims of time exist and the non-cosmic time can be intersected at any point along the U. timeline.

Prove that, and there's a Nobel Prize in physics with your name on it.

Anyone can come along and make these types of assertions. Not impressed.

[snowtracks]

the U. is an effect. Therefore the causal agent existed 'before' the cosmic time line that began with U.. So at least 2 dims of time exist and the non-cosmic time can be intersected at any point along the U. timeline.

Prove that, and there's a Nobel Prize in physics with your name on it.

Anyone can come along and make these types of assertions. Not impressed.

the space-time theorems traces the U. back to a beginning. the principle of causality states an effect (U.) is preceded by a cause, and the cause is always greater than the effect. this principle has never been observed to have been violated. Remember, this is not an intented proof of God existence, so don't be concerned with that but be concerned with the logical implications.

[Ryantology]

What sort of learning disability is necessary to invent an answer which is ridiculous beyond description and make yourself believe it is absolutely true?

[Jackalope]

Prove that, and there's a Nobel Prize in physics with your name on it.

Anyone can come along and make these types of assertions. Not impressed.

the space-time theorems traces the U. back to a beginning. the principle of causality states an effect (U.) is preceded by a cause, and the cause is always greater than the effect. this principle has never been observed to have been violated. Remember, this is not an intented proof of God existence, so don't be concerned with that but be concerned with the logical implications.

Citation for that needed.

The theories trace back to a point in time before which we know nothing, and at present, are incapable of looking past. To assert that it's an absolute beginning overstates what we know.

Do you seriously believe that cosmologists and physicists haven't considered the implications with respect to causality? Do you really think that such a simple concept would be overlooked, and that your proof by assertion is something that ought to be taken seriously?

[snowtracks]

the space-time theorems traces the U. back to a beginning. the principle of causality states an effect (U.) is preceded by a cause, and the cause is always greater than the effect. this principle has never been observed to have been violated. Remember, this is not an intented proof of God existence, so don't be concerned with that but be concerned with the logical implications.

Citation for that needed.

The theories trace back to a point in time before which we know nothing, and at present, are incapable of looking past. To assert that it's an absolute beginning overstates what we know.

Do you seriously believe that cosmologists and physicists haven't considered the implications with respect to causality? Do you really think that such a simple concept would be overlooked, and that your proof by assertion is something that ought to be taken seriously?

it was a try. better than asking derogatory questions continuously.

[Cinjin]

Don't waste your time I do not preach here, you want me gone that bad, you are pathetic at best and something less than human in reality.

GC

Yeah, GC "doesn't preach here" but his signature is a an open affront to the no-preaching rules with his bull shit passive aggressive threat of eternal damnation.

It's just the typical stinking hypocritical horse shit we always have to put up with from these religious half-wits.

[Mystical]