Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 28, 2024, 1:12 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Calling Out Demolition Deniers
#11
RE: Calling Out Demolition Deniers
9/11 truthers are like birthers.

Just when you think they're dead and buried, they come back like motherfucking night of the living dead...
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
Reply
#12
RE: Calling Out Demolition Deniers
(October 17, 2013 at 8:29 pm)The Germans are coming Wrote: The "second" explosion was debunked.

That was not a detenation caused by explosives, but debris falling from the towers in the elevator shaft.

I disagree, because I don't think that the falling of debris would make such a loud and distinct sound of explosion, and because ...

"Even if the planes’ impacts and the fall of the debris from the Towers onto the ground could have generated seismic waves, their magnitude would have been insufficient to be recorded 34 km away and should have been very similar in the two cases to one another. As we have shown, they were not."

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/12/s...n-911.html

(October 17, 2013 at 8:29 pm)The Germans are coming Wrote: Rayaan, what are your motivations for this conspiracy nonsence?

Oh, just to demonstrate your

[Image: 12FVhSJ.jpg]

Big Grin

(October 17, 2013 at 8:29 pm)The Germans are coming Wrote: And does it have something to do with you being muslim?

I don't think so.

I used to believe that the 9/11 attacks were orchestrated by some Muslims extremists/terrorists as well (for the first 10 years after the 9/11) and that didn't really affect my perception of Muslims in general nor about Islam because I know for a fact that such an action is not supported by our religion at all. However, it was only after I started to research on this subject about 2 years ago that I began to realize that a lot of things about the 9/11 suggest that it was actually an inside job. I don't claim to know that for sure, but the conspiracy theory makes a lot more sense to me.

(October 17, 2013 at 8:47 pm)Minimalist Wrote: If I want to know something about a battle, I'll go ask a couple of privates what they saw from their foxhole. That should give me the whole picture, right?

Not necessarily the whole picture, but eyewitness accounts can be a very useful contribution to our knowledge of an event, especially when there are many reports and when the amount of similarity between the reports are much greater than the amount of contradictions between them. The 9/11 seems to be an example of this.

The thing is that you cannot look at the whole picture by just taking one particular fact or information that is presented to you. You have to gather information from many different sources, put all the pieces togother, and only then you may get close to seeing the whole picture. So first-hand accounts are an important part of such an investigative process; you cannot ignore them entirely.

(October 17, 2013 at 8:47 pm)Minimalist Wrote: You conveniently leave out the fact that there is no evidence for any demolition activity.

There are some evidence, in fact.




(October 17, 2013 at 8:47 pm)Minimalist Wrote: And, as has been demonstrated controlled demolitions begin at the bottom of a building...not the top.

They can start from the top to the bottom as well.

And witnesses did say that they heard and saw explosions at the basement of one of the towers. See the second video in my OP.

(October 17, 2013 at 8:47 pm)Minimalist Wrote: If there were actual demolition charges at the bottom of that building those guys would be dead.

They won't dead if they were far enough and somehow escaped within time. One can still see and hear explosions from a distance. It's not something impossible.
Reply
#13
RE: Calling Out Demolition Deniers
(October 17, 2013 at 10:00 pm)Zazzy Wrote: Rayaan, the Prof is on your side. This should tell you something.

It just tells me that he agrees with me. That's all.

(October 17, 2013 at 10:33 pm)Chas Wrote: You didn't refute squat, except maybe others' opinions.

[sarasm-tags-just-in-case]
No ... I was refuting the undeniable TRUTH! I was refuting 100% facts and undeniable EVIDENCE!
[/sarasm-tags-just-in-case]
Reply
#14
RE: Calling Out Demolition Deniers
This shit makes me sad.
Reply
#15
RE: Calling Out Demolition Deniers
Let us all get soe perspective here, we may never know the truth behind 9/11. We can also argue all day long if it was an inside job, or more elaborate, or it was exactly as the government stated, however thoses are irrelevant now. The point is there was 4 planes hijacked, the people on those planes are gone or dead, planes hit the towers and the pentagon was hit. What we need to focus on is what happened after 9/11. That is the most important thing we SHOULD really be debating here.
[Image: grumpy-cat-and-jesus-meme-died-for-sins.jpg]

I would be a televangelist....but I have too much of a soul.
Reply
#16
RE: Calling Out Demolition Deniers
Didn't watch the videos but I was curious to find out why anyone believes this crap. Still don't know. Kind of like my curiosity about belief in gods. Still don't know why people want to believe that either. In the case of believing in gods, at least there is the excuse that your parents made you drink the kool ade since forever. Maybe once you start believing in weird shit there is a tendency to look for more weird shit? I don't know, but there are atheists who believe this crap too.
Reply
#17
RE: Calling Out Demolition Deniers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ch1slDf63Zw

Sorry, couldn't resist Big Grin
Reply
#18
RE: Calling Out Demolition Deniers
Quote: but eyewitness accounts can be a very useful


I disagree. I've served on juries and eye-witnesses are highly overrated. A competent defense attorney can reduce them to blubbering piles of goo on the witness stand because most people are about as observant as a loaf of bread. The forensic evidence is always more damning.

The fact that these guys were in the lobby - so they say - and survived is ample proof that what they heard were not explosions from a controlled demolition. They would have been killed when the building fell down on their head.
Reply
#19
RE: Calling Out Demolition Deniers
Hijack You must all come with me! Panic Do not panic! Truce Surrender at once!
Reply
#20
RE: Calling Out Demolition Deniers
[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ_1Tky1zYdk_99mM6RaXF...OMiYlxieVQ]
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Kyiv is Calling onlinebiker 0 256 March 20, 2022 at 10:47 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Political ads calling people "socialists" Foxaèr 5 526 October 10, 2018 at 11:47 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  What is it with Trump supporters not wanting to discuss policy without name calling NuclearEnergy 73 13173 December 28, 2016 at 8:00 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Why is Hilary calling the FBI director Coney a liar? ReptilianPeon 21 1888 August 3, 2016 at 4:57 am
Last Post: Aractus
  'Stop Calling us Nazis' cratehorus 18 5642 September 15, 2012 at 9:14 am
Last Post: Puddleglum
  Priest Speaks Out and Gets Kicked Out Erinome 24 9152 December 20, 2011 at 9:35 am
Last Post: Jaysyn
  Calling all Democrats... The Prophet 28 5553 November 30, 2011 at 10:04 am
Last Post: 5thHorseman
  Uproar over Jerry Brown's aides calling Meg Whitman a "whore" Autumnlicious 0 3128 October 15, 2010 at 4:38 pm
Last Post: Autumnlicious



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)