Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 24, 2024, 7:04 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Calling Out Demolition Deniers
#1
Calling Out Demolition Deniers
I know a lot of this was already discussed in 9/11's mother thread, but I wanted to put the following videos in a separate thread because I want more people to see them and I personally find them very compelling in support of the claim that bombs were implanted inside the buildings. And of course, then I would like to know what your opinions are on the eyewitness accounts provided therein.












Some of you might argue that it couldn't have been done by the US government because they can't obviously pull off something "so big" and "so complex" without anyone else from inside the government exposing them (and anyone who does so are simply lunatics) ...

which I have also refuted in this post and this post in the previous thread.
Reply
#2
RE: Calling Out Demolition Deniers
And this:

Quote:First of all, we show the contradictions in the official explanation between the seismic data and the timing of the events. Then we point out that it is strange that identical events (percussions of identical towers on the one hand, and collapses of identical towers on the other hand) at the same location would have generated seismic sources of different magnitudes. We demonstrate that only strong explosives could be the cause of such seismic waves, in accordance with the observed low frequencies. According to the nature of the recorded waves (body and surface waves), we can propose a location of each explosive source. According to the presence of shear waves or the presence of Rayleigh waves only, we hypothesize a subterranean … explosion.

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/12/s...n-911.html
Reply
#3
RE: Calling Out Demolition Deniers
The "second" explosion was debunked.

That was not a detenation caused by explosives, but debris falling from the towers in the elevator shaft.



Rayaan, what are your motivations for this conspiracy nonsence? And does it have something to do with you being muslim?
Reply
#4
RE: Calling Out Demolition Deniers
Oh, not the eye-witness shit again, Rayaan.

If I want to know something about a battle, I'll go ask a couple of privates what they saw from their foxhole. That should give me the whole picture, right?

You conveniently leave out the fact that there is no evidence for any demolition activity. And, as has been demonstrated controlled demolitions begin at the bottom of a building...not the top. If there were actual demolition charges at the bottom of that building those guys would be dead.

Period.
Reply
#5
RE: Calling Out Demolition Deniers
All our knowledge of building collapses comes from "controlled demolitions".

No fucking shit a building collapsing from a pancake effect looks like a "controlled demolition" despite being an uncontrolled demolition/disaster.

If all one knows is a hammer, then you might describe a hammer as a club.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
Reply
#6
RE: Calling Out Demolition Deniers
Nano thermite was found in the area after the event.
Thermite was developed in the late 1800s as an explosive, when mixed with varying degrees of small particles (nano) of aluminum (and or iron / copper I think) it makes a customized high temp detonator / explosive.

The buildings security system was shut down in the weeks prior to the destruction. Months before that, the insurance was upped.

The engineers who designed the buildings described the steel used as like a window screen. Punch a hole in one section and that is all you get. One hole. The towers were designed to take TWO hits from the largest airliner of the day each building.

No building in history that was a steel structure has ever gone down via a fire. The Empire state building was hit in the 40s by a bomber. It was repaired.
Jet fuel is close to kerosene in composition. It burns nowhere close to what is required to melt steel (I am a code welder. I know metal)
.
I do not believe Muslims were even in the planes, I suspect no pilots were either. Where did Drone tech come from? Were these a pilot run for what we see now?
No jet went down in Penn. When the investigators got there, all they found was a large blast hole. No jet parts, no bodies. They turned and went home.
The cell phone call supposedly from that "plane" was manufactured, cell phones did not work in aircraft, I am told, unless there is an antenna like planes now have. Cell phones work in direct line of sight- just like FM and TV signals. Their broadcast tower antennas are not aimed up.

No jet hit the Pentagon either- same lack of any jet parts or body parts. Both hits were rockets.

I know the plan as described by Albert Pike (Mason) in the mid 1800s was 3 great wars to bring mankind to abhor war so much that a world govt. would be accepted. The last war would be with the Moslems.
The back of the Koran creates terrorists- perfect for the occasion.

That war is what the Arab Spring was all about. Secular dictators were replaced with Islamic terrorist supporters. This was done by U.S. operations. They recently lost Egypt from their grasp,and are trying to blackmail Egypt into re-instating the Muslim terrorist Morsi.

Notice the twin towers were replaced by the ONE tower. A sublime statement of the elete's goal.
Not only did the weapons makers and bankers reap a fantastic harvest of war and profits from 9-11, the goal of war with the entire Islamic world comes closer.

Here is a little bit about the tower- and more (what will the flack over this one look like??)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9pdJzVaJ...Q&index=13
Reply
#7
RE: Calling Out Demolition Deniers
Rayaan, the Prof is on your side. This should tell you something.
Reply
#8
RE: Calling Out Demolition Deniers
You're a code welder?

Then you'd know that steel doesn't need to be subjected to enough heat to melt in order for it to become weaker in its tensile strength.

You don't know jack shit and I'm not taking your word for it, either. You apparently don't even know your supposed trade. It's been demonstrated by dozens upon dozens of metallurgists and steel workers that jet fuel flames are plenty sufficient to cause significant loss of tensile strength in steel.

Hey, Professor, Derpington University just called, they said your tenure just got extended.
Reply
#9
RE: Calling Out Demolition Deniers
(October 17, 2013 at 8:15 pm)Rayaan Wrote: Some of you might argue that it couldn't have been done by the US government because they can't obviously pull off something "so big" and "so complex" without anyone else from inside the government exposing them (and anyone who does so are simply lunatics) ...

which I have also refuted in this post and this post in the previous thread.

You didn't refute squat, except maybe others' opinions.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply
#10
RE: Calling Out Demolition Deniers
Thermite claim debunked. http://www.debunking911.com/thermite.htm
First time in history debunked. http://www.debunking911.com/firsttime.htm
More thermite claim debuked. http://www.debunking911.com/moltensteel.htm
Fires debunked. http://www.debunking911.com/fire.htm

As for the Pentagon? I saw the fucking jet go over my damn apartment, you retard. also. http://www.popularmechanics.com/technolo...s-pentagon

As for the rest of your half-baked claims. http://www.debunking911.com/meeting.htm

Now seriously shut the fuck up. Everyone who brings this stupid fucking topic up. It's been debunked. Every time you open your fucking mouths to try to bring something new to it; IT'S ALREADY BEEN TORN A THOUSAND ASSHOLES. It happened. DEAL WITH IT. We all have managed to.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Kyiv is Calling onlinebiker 0 259 March 20, 2022 at 10:47 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Political ads calling people "socialists" Foxaèr 5 551 October 10, 2018 at 11:47 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  What is it with Trump supporters not wanting to discuss policy without name calling NuclearEnergy 73 13483 December 28, 2016 at 8:00 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Why is Hilary calling the FBI director Coney a liar? ReptilianPeon 21 1918 August 3, 2016 at 4:57 am
Last Post: Aractus
  'Stop Calling us Nazis' cratehorus 18 5695 September 15, 2012 at 9:14 am
Last Post: Puddleglum
  Priest Speaks Out and Gets Kicked Out Erinome 24 9213 December 20, 2011 at 9:35 am
Last Post: Jaysyn
  Calling all Democrats... The Prophet 28 5658 November 30, 2011 at 10:04 am
Last Post: 5thHorseman
  Uproar over Jerry Brown's aides calling Meg Whitman a "whore" Autumnlicious 0 3130 October 15, 2010 at 4:38 pm
Last Post: Autumnlicious



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)