Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 29, 2024, 10:24 pm
Thread Rating:
Sinful Believers Wearing Their Sins
|
(October 28, 2013 at 4:42 pm)Doubting Thomas Wrote: Only if you can prove there's a god to sin against. Otherwise it sounds like you're creating the problem and then offering the only solution. Ok, before the "God problem" you present . . . Two people are in a room, person A and person B. Person A goes over to Person B and punches him/her in the face repeatedly. Assuming that Person B does not want to be punched in the face, is there a problem? And how do we know? Or how about this . . . People A and People B both live on the same planet. Despite being of the same species (homo sapiens) People A terrorizes People B, locks them up, exterminating some and carrying out painful experiments on the rest. Is there a problem? And how do we know?
". . . let the atheists themselves choose a god. They will find only one divinity who ever uttered their isolation; only one religion in which God seemed for an instant to be an atheist." -G. K. Chesterton
Quote:For example- loving your neighbor as yourself. Treating others the way you would want to be treated. Do you agree with that idea as being a good idea and worthy of trying to follow? Absolutely.....an idea Quote:Do not to your neighbour what you would take ill from him. (Pittacus of Mytilene, 650 BCE) in Greek philosophy which predates your boy by nearly 7 centuries. (October 28, 2013 at 6:21 pm)GodsRevolt Wrote:(October 28, 2013 at 4:42 pm)Doubting Thomas Wrote: Only if you can prove there's a god to sin against. Otherwise it sounds like you're creating the problem and then offering the only solution. If this is your style, you'll burn fast strawman. Ignore list here you come. (October 28, 2013 at 6:18 pm)freedomfromfallacy Wrote:(October 28, 2013 at 6:13 pm)GodsRevolt Wrote: Do you agree with that idea as being a good idea and worthy of trying to follow? Not a deflection. I am trying to establish if you believe in any kind of moral behavior as opposed to immoral. You see? Because I do not know you personally, so I have to listen first. I understand from quick observation that you do not believe in God. If you are a total nihilist then we are having a completely different conversation then if you an atheist who believes in a certain moral standard. Now, again, because I do not know you I can not scientifically list out your sins. Even if I did know you, I wouldn't be able to. I do not know your heart. But I would have to ask you another question to established if you sinned (assuming you are an atheist with a moral standard). Have you ever had to, or felt you should, apologize to someone? Now, if you are a complete nihilist, I would move on so a different topic all together being that you believe in nothing, and nothing has value, including human interaction and relationships.
". . . let the atheists themselves choose a god. They will find only one divinity who ever uttered their isolation; only one religion in which God seemed for an instant to be an atheist." -G. K. Chesterton
RE: Sinful Believers Wearing Their Sins
October 28, 2013 at 6:40 pm
(This post was last modified: October 28, 2013 at 6:48 pm by pineapplebunnybounce.)
(October 28, 2013 at 6:06 pm)GodsRevolt Wrote:(October 28, 2013 at 4:33 pm)pineapplebunnybounce Wrote: Religious folks are always quick to concede that their religion does not necessarily make believers better person. someone who goes out of their way to avoid causing harm to others would be a good person. Within reason of course, I don't expect people to sacrifice themselves for strangers especially when the sacrifice is disproportionate, I don't consider that good. Edit: I don't believe in "good persons", in my post I said better. I don't believe in completely bad or completely good people. Actually I believe in completely bad, but not completely good. (October 28, 2013 at 6:35 pm)GodsRevolt Wrote: Have you ever had to, or felt you should, apologize to someone?Atheists don't apologize, GR. Ever. We are way too busy eating Christian babies and attending Dawkins study sessions for any of that nonsense. In any case, none of it means anything anyway, given that all of us are nihilists. No purpose to life. Such a bleak existence- except for the delicious babies. Are we going to have the morality conversation with EVERY SINGLE ONE of you uneducated twits? (October 28, 2013 at 6:28 pm)freedomfromfallacy Wrote:(October 28, 2013 at 6:21 pm)GodsRevolt Wrote: Ok, before the "God problem" you present . . . This is not a straw man. You claimed that I was making up a problem to justify God. I am countering that by first addressing that there is a problem in the world that I did not create - the way people treat others at times. So, my question to you is, "If there is a problem in the world, how do we know it to be a problem without first admitting that there is sin?" If the word "sin" throws you, we can call it whatever you like. Immoral behavior? Either way, I did not create it. Once we agree on this point (or disagree), we can start working towards the "God problem" you presented - What does God have to do with "immoral behavior."
". . . let the atheists themselves choose a god. They will find only one divinity who ever uttered their isolation; only one religion in which God seemed for an instant to be an atheist." -G. K. Chesterton
(October 28, 2013 at 6:35 pm)GodsRevolt Wrote: Have you ever had to, or felt you should, apologize to someone?Is there a reason I should apologize? Is that your real question? Are you about to equivocate my awareness that I may have stumbled within my social group, and need to assert corrections, with the assumption of a necessary cause outside myself and my group, i.e. god? If so, then you may move on. Your entire premise is based upon an assumed presumption with absolutely no quantifiable nor empirical evidence to support it. The bible, your ever-changing traditions, your gooey feelings, and your fantasies are all your ilk have - not a god. (October 28, 2013 at 6:43 pm)Zazzy Wrote:(October 28, 2013 at 6:35 pm)GodsRevolt Wrote: Have you ever had to, or felt you should, apologize to someone?Atheists don't apologize, GR. Ever. We are way too busy eating Christian babies and attending Dawkins study sessions for any of that nonsense. Eating babies! Got it! You see? Now I am getting to know you better. I prefer roasted chicken, but it doesn't really matter (nihilist joke, not very good). Now you know me a little better, but that means nothing as well (can't stop). No purpose to life, that means that you are completely free to make up your own purpose, do whatever you like. But this also means that you are can ignore logic? Since it means nothing. Just a bunch of babbling animals pretending to be something more than what they are. Do you deny logic?
". . . let the atheists themselves choose a god. They will find only one divinity who ever uttered their isolation; only one religion in which God seemed for an instant to be an atheist." -G. K. Chesterton
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)