Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 20, 2024, 12:27 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Neo Paganism
#81
RE: Neo Paganism
Uh huh. And leftist.
[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]
Reply
#82
RE: Neo Paganism
(March 9, 2014 at 2:08 pm)thesummerqueen Wrote: Uh huh. And leftist.

yes you've implicitly admitted that you see wicca as inferior and are usingb political correctness to stop me from saying this
Reply
#83
RE: Neo Paganism
(March 9, 2014 at 2:05 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote: no they arent you responses are just inherently wrong

Rrrgh, I wasn't even going to comment in this thread, but these single sentence "inherently wrong," style posts just make my goddamn head explode.

This is lazy argumentation, good sir: instead of having a reasoned and well thought out response, you decide to just circumvent the entire process of discussion by claiming that the wrongness of your opponent's position is some background feature of the universe?

Not done, Jimmy. Not. Done.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
#84
RE: Neo Paganism
(March 9, 2014 at 2:18 pm)Esquilax Wrote:
(March 9, 2014 at 2:05 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote: no they arent you responses are just inherently wrong

Rrrgh, I wasn't even going to comment in this thread, but these single sentence "inherently wrong," style posts just make my goddamn head explode.

This is lazy argumentation, good sir: instead of having a reasoned and well thought out response, you decide to just circumvent the entire process of discussion by claiming that the wrongness of your opponent's position is some background feature of the universe?

Not done, Jimmy. Not. Done.
there is no uniform process of debate this is not philosophy class she admitted that is gay and that she sees gay people as repellant. I am correct

(March 9, 2014 at 2:18 pm)Esquilax Wrote:
(March 9, 2014 at 2:05 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote: no they arent you responses are just inherently wrong

Rrrgh, I wasn't even going to comment in this thread, but these single sentence "inherently wrong," style posts just make my goddamn head explode.

This is lazy argumentation, good sir: instead of having a reasoned and well thought out response, you decide to just circumvent the entire process of discussion by claiming that the wrongness of your opponent's position is some background feature of the universe?

Not done, Jimmy. Not. Done.
she asked me why i though wicca was stupid i had no reason for this other that it was not to my liking so i decided to prove that not only did she not like it by neither oes anybody else they are just play acting
Reply
#85
RE: Neo Paganism
(March 9, 2014 at 2:25 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote: there is no uniform process of debate this is not philosophy class she admitted that is gay and that she sees gay people as repellant. I am correct

If you are correct, you're correct for reasons, and not just because reality itself has, as a condition of existence, the fact that you are. When you stop at "you're inherently wrong," then you aren't having a debate, you're having an assertion.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
#86
RE: Neo Paganism
(March 9, 2014 at 2:30 pm)Esquilax Wrote:
(March 9, 2014 at 2:25 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote: there is no uniform process of debate this is not philosophy class she admitted that is gay and that she sees gay people as repellant. I am correct

If you are correct, you're correct for reasons, and not just because reality itself has, as a condition of existence, the fact that you are. When you stop at "you're inherently wrong," then you aren't having a debate, you're having an assertion.

my reason for being correct is that the current state of society being what it is with political and minority groups what and see chriatianity and the main source of opression in the west. My assertion is that because of these things people will by default see wicca as less important
Reply
#87
RE: Neo Paganism
(March 9, 2014 at 2:10 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote: yes you've implicitly admitted that you see wicca as inferior and are usingb political correctness to stop me from saying this

I see all religions as inferior to reason - not wicca as inferior to Christianity. Actually, I specified that I thought it was superior to others (which included Christianity).

Me calling you out for being an ignorant asshole had nothing to do with that. You were just being a douchecopter.

(March 9, 2014 at 2:25 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote: she asked me why i though wicca was stupid i had no reason for this other that it was not to my liking so i decided to prove that not only did she not like it by neither oes anybody else they are just play acting

PS - if I had been flirting with converting, I'd be stupid to "not like it".

You completely 180'd what I said because otherwise you'd have no fucking argument at all.
[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]
Reply
#88
RE: Neo Paganism
(March 9, 2014 at 3:03 pm)thesummerqueen Wrote:
(March 9, 2014 at 2:10 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote: yes you've implicitly admitted that you see wicca as inferior and are usingb political correctness to stop me from saying this

I see all religions as inferior to reason - not wicca as inferior to Christianity. Actually, I specified that I thought it was superior to others (which included Christianity).

Me calling you out for being an ignorant asshole had nothing to do with that. You were just being a douchecopter.

(March 9, 2014 at 2:25 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote: she asked me why i though wicca was stupid i had no reason for this other that it was not to my liking so i decided to prove that not only did she not like it by neither oes anybody else they are just play acting

PS - if I had been flirting with converting, I'd be stupid to "not like it".

You completely 180'd what I said because otherwise you'd have no fucking argument at all.
see the libertarianism again
Reply
#89
RE: Neo Paganism
Non answer to the accusation that you fucked up.

Go for a walk, dude - you can't read.
[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Lightbulb [Serious] Opinions on paganism? Methamphetamine 73 4060 November 9, 2023 at 6:15 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Paganism vs. Monotheism uniquepegasister 27 11062 August 13, 2015 at 2:58 pm
Last Post: Pyrrho
  Hitler's Priestess: Savitri Devi, the Hindu-Aryan Myth, and Neo-Nazism theyear12013 2 3322 December 30, 2013 at 7:58 am
Last Post: theyear12013



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)