Does he have a point?

[BrokenQuill92]

[rexbeccarox]

No. As much as I admire the man, I disagree with him on this topic. He doesn't have to apply a label to himself, but by defining atheism as a "movement", he is applying a label to others, which is hypocritical and somewhat arrogant.

Also, he's wrong. I don't particularly like the word "atheist" but it does describe me. He says "Atheists" are "active" (I capitalized "Atheist" because that's the way he used the word: as a title). Bullshit. Some are, some aren't. I'm not. Even on this forum, I tend toward many other topics before atheism.

[Minimalist]

Yeah. He should stick to astrophysics the way Dawkins should stick to biology.

And theologians should join a rodeo and pick up bullshit because that's all they are good for.