Ariel Sharon Dies at 85

[là bạn điên]

From my understanding it seems there is alot of 'woo' regarding libertarians, somewhat of an overgeneralization. It is a political idea, how utopic, but to be fair, they all are. The major fallacy its in the 'human rights declaration' article 1: All humans are born equal. How utopic

Yes it is rather silly since demonstrable all humans are not born equal unelss you define the term in such a way as to become meaningless.

[Tiberius]

My understanding of Libertarianism leads me to understand that a person can be happily racist and refuse to conduct any business with another and Libertarians would leave that to his or her individual choice but libertarians oppose any government racism.

Pretty much. The example you give is probably the most common reason why Libertarians are called "racists", but it's based entirely on a misunderstanding. Libertarians believe in the free market; a private means of exchanging goods and services. If it is private, rather than public, then every transaction is controlled absolutely by the people who are directly involved with it (i.e. the producer and the consumer). If the producer decides they don't want to sell to the consumer, they can reject the transaction, and if the consumer decides they don't want to buy from the producer, they can do the same.

It works in much the same way as it would with how most private property works today. If you own a house, you can (for the most part) set your own rules about who you let into and out of your house.

Yes it is rather silly since demonstrable all humans are not born equal unelss you define the term in such a way as to become meaningless.

The whole "born equal" thing is purely philosophical. Clearly a person born to a wealthy family is "more wealthy" than someone born to a poor family, and therefore not economically equal. What the "born equal" statement means is that no person is worth more than any other; that when deciding how a government should treat its citizens, things like wealth, race, sex, gender, etc. should not matter or indeed come into the process at all.

[EgoRaptor]

[quote='EgoRaptor' pid='582737' dateline='1389669219']The term in the US came into fashion because the term 'liberal' has been so corrupted in the USA that it mow refers to an authoritarian anti free speech, wealth confiscating movement which is utterly at conflict with the way American 'Liberals' currently act. American 'liberals' are really social democrats.

Similar to communist, communist used to mean a proletarian revolutionist who supported the abolition of private property. Now it means a middle class leftist thug who bends over backwards for cultural Jihad.

---

Leftist too, leftist used to mean someone who opposed the political establishment & supported radical working-class political ideas. Now it means someone who protests against free speech, hates Israel & bends over to take the Moslem dick of cultural Jihah up the ass.

[Autumnlicious]

Are you mentally all there?

[Polaris]

It's sad that the instigator of the 2nd Intifada will be venerated in Israel.

[là bạn điên]

It's sad that the instigator of the 2nd Intifada will be venerated in Israel.

Those palestinians just can't help it...right? They Had NO CHOICE but to start an uprising because a JEW decided to go onto the temple mount

[Polaris]

It's sad that the instigator of the 2nd Intifada will be venerated in Israel.

Those palestinians just can't help it...right? They Had NO CHOICE but to start an uprising because a JEW decided to go onto the temple mount

With a police riot force no less. How dare those Palestinians feel threatened.

[là bạn điên]

Those palestinians just can't help it...right? They Had NO CHOICE but to start an uprising because a JEW decided to go onto the temple mount

With a police riot force no less. How dare those Palestinians feel threatened.

Of course with riot police given that Muslims tend to kill people who dare to defy their stupid religion.

Temple mount is sacred to Jews and Muslims. Why should Muslims decide who can and cannot go there? Why should Muslims decide they can start a war on that basis.

Clearly arafat had wanted an uprising all along and this was the excuse he wanted

[Tiberius]

This is already my favourite thread of 2014, and for all the wrong reasons.

[Polaris]

With a police riot force no less. How dare those Palestinians feel threatened.

Of course with riot police given that Muslims tend to kill people who dare to defy their stupid religion.

Temple mount is sacred to Jews and Muslims. Why should Muslims decide who can and cannot go there? Why should Muslims decide they can start a war on that basis.

Clearly arafat had wanted an uprising all along and this was the excuse he wanted

Is this member a sock puppet?