Banned at another atheist forum

[Heywood]

You're on ignore, where you should be.

Praise Jebus!

[Chas]

"Don't have that excuse to be dicks"

Do you not think it's a complete dick move in the first place to go onto an atheist forum as a theist with a name that tells everyone else to "blow you".

Seriously? And you guys wonder why we think you're all as dumb as a bag of rocks.

I thought the name was funny.

It seems though that just declaring yourself a theist is a dick move at atheist forums. I'm thinking about joining another atheist forum pretending to be an atheist just to see if it affects my how people treat me.

I bet if I joined a Christian forum as an atheist people would be dicks too....so don't get me wrong...I'm not saying atheists have a tendency to be bigger asses then any other population.

It might delay it slightly, but your personality will shine through and you will be laughed at.

Your description of your time at TTA is incorrect - do you actually believe that's what happened?

You didn't declare yourself a theist until your posts and arguments were shown to be nonsensical and you were pressured into admitting to being theist. And even then, you prevaricated.

And people didn't start making fun of your name until then, either.

So, no, it wasn't your name; it was your silly ideas.

[Heywood]

It might delay it slightly, but your personality will shine through and you will be laughed at.

Your description of your time at TTA is incorrect - do you actually believe that's what happened?

You didn't declare yourself a theist until your posts and arguments were shown to be nonsensical and you were pressured into admitting to being theist. And even then, you prevaricated.

And people didn't start making fun of your name until then, either.

So, no, it wasn't your name; it was your silly ideas.

What Chas wrote is factually incorrect. You can search TTA and see that I declared my theism from the start at TTA in the introduction thread.

[Napoléon]

Strange, I can't find an introduction thread you made there. The first post I can find of yours is something about atheists influencing mass shootings.

[Bucky Ball]

It appears he did announce it here, where he got the definition of a "miracle" wrong, but it's a perfect example of his drivel.
Does THIS make any sense ? Not a bit.
http://www.thethinkingatheist.com/forum/...eve?page=3
" For a miracle to actually be a miracle, it has to be an event that goes beyond the usual and ordinary circumstances of nature. That means its going to be rare and by rare I mean maybe happening just once in the history of humanity. If amputees occassionally grow limbs back, then growing limbs back becomes a natural phenomena that happens to occur occasionally.
Suppose you lose your arm in a wood chipper and the doc tells you there is a 1 in a 100 million chance it will grow back. Further suppose you meet a theist who also happened to have a wood chipper accident. The thiest tells you he prayed to God and by a miracle his arm grew back. Would you consider that evidence of the existence of God? I wouldn't...and I am a theist."

Hahaha. He contradicts himself, totally. He defines a "miracle" by his own (strange) definition ... which is what we saw all the time. Strange personal re-definitions. It's incoherent. And the definition (Biblically) is a completely NORMAL event, in which a believer sees "the hand of God operating".

[Heywood]

Strange, I can't find an introduction thread you made there. The first post I can find of yours is something about atheists influencing mass shootings.

I didn't make an introduction thread. I made a post in the introduction thread.

Search user name "Heywood Jahblome" under introductions. Search select "posts" not "threads".

And for the record, this was the OP in the thread titled "Is atheism responsible for mass shootings".

Please don't hate me for starting this thread. Its not an attack on the validity of atheism. I am, however, suspicious that recent mass shootings might be an artifact of a growing trend in this country toward atheistic beleifs. My thinking goes like this: Imagine a pyscopath who believes in God. If that pyschopath get depressed and decides to kill himself he/she might refrain from killing others in the process because of a fear of going to hell. Remove that fear and you remove a layer of protection from innocent people.

My last post in that thread was this:

The title of this thread was ill concieved. The thread itself was ill concieved. I wish now I hadn't even started it....so I will grant you that.

However it does not follow that just because I believe the fear of hell to be a deterent that means I believe that if somone is an atheist then the must be immoral

[rexbeccarox]

I'm honestly baffled as to why a discussion would go on at this length about another effing forum.

[psychoslice]

I found that its much easier to be banned from religious forums than atheist forums, my god what did you do ???.

[Chas]

It might delay it slightly, but your personality will shine through and you will be laughed at.

Your description of your time at TTA is incorrect - do you actually believe that's what happened?

You didn't declare yourself a theist until your posts and arguments were shown to be nonsensical and you were pressured into admitting to being theist. And even then, you prevaricated.

And people didn't start making fun of your name until then, either.

So, no, it wasn't your name; it was your silly ideas.

What Chas wrote is factually incorrect. You can search TTA and see that I declared my theism from the start at TTA in the introduction thread.

I stand corrected. My recall is flawed.

I think what colored my memory was that your argumentation on every subject was worded to attack a scientific view without clearly stating your theistic stance.

I had not read your earliest threads.

[Tonus]

Johnny V always likes to bitch and moan, for whatever reason.

He just needs a bit of TLC: