Ah, but remember that god invented the rainbow to show Noah that he would never flood the earth again.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 8, 2024, 6:18 pm
Thread Rating:
Why no miracles anymore?
|
(March 30, 2014 at 9:35 am)professor Wrote: Why not today? God: weaker than my quizzical looks, atheism, the constitution and satan, a guy he's supposedly stronger than.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects! RE: Why no miracles anymore?
March 30, 2014 at 1:02 pm
(This post was last modified: March 30, 2014 at 1:03 pm by Minimalist.)
Quote:Sounds to me like we are overdue for another flood. Coming soon. http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2014...tlook.html Quote:According to NOAA’s Spring Outlook released today, rivers in half of the continental United States are at minor or moderate risk of exceeding flood levels this spring with the highest threat in the southern Great Lakes region due to above-average snowpack and a deep layer of frozen ground. Additionally, drought is expected to continue in California and the Southwest. RE: Why no miracles anymore?
March 30, 2014 at 1:07 pm
(This post was last modified: March 30, 2014 at 1:08 pm by fr0d0.)
(March 30, 2014 at 8:27 am)Bad Writer Wrote:(March 30, 2014 at 6:09 am)fr0d0 Wrote: In the bible, those who believe that Jesus is the Christ, became healed as a result of believing – not the other way around. I didn't call you adulterous. You owned that. The observation wasn't by someone who didn't believe these were miracles now was it? (March 30, 2014 at 12:10 pm)KUSA Wrote:(March 30, 2014 at 6:09 am)fr0d0 Wrote: In the bible, those who believe that Jesus is the Christ, became healed as a result of believing – not the other way around. Can you show how you reach your conclusion based on what I said please?
Frodo, you dishonest dingbat. When you quoted scripture at us, you were essentially calling is adulterous. Since you so desire to turn that around on me, please explain exactly how I "owned that". Please don't think too hard about it because you'll find that I didn't. At all.
(March 30, 2014 at 2:22 am)NoraBrimstone Wrote: Because most of the stuff that used to be considered "miraculous" can now be explained naturally? (March 30, 2014 at 2:38 am)Esquilax Wrote: Here's what's going to happen: the first theist is going to come into this thread, and the first sentence they're going to type is something along the lines of "who says there are no more miracles?" I'm going to paraphrase Tim Minchin and his famous poem "Storm": By definition, events of "the supernatural" are either proven not to be true or not proven to be true. Do you know what they call a supernatural event that is proven to be true? Natural. You see, if it really exists, it can be potentially observed, studied and eventually understood and explained. Once it can be understood and explained, it's incorporated into our concept of the natural universe. If it turned out that ghosts really were real, for example, scientists could eventually invent Dr. Venkman style devices that could detect ectoplasmic energy signatures or even capture ghosts in a box as long as you don't cross the streams. Or like in Supernatural where Sam and Dean have devices that can detect spiritual disturbances.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too." ... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept "(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question" ... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
In response to Esq-
Jesus made an amazing statement to the leaders of his day. He said,"You make the word of God to no effect BY YOUR TRADITIONS". Therefore, there would be an effect by the word of God - (thru people- that is usually how God works) if the lies of tradition weren't in them. Since faith comes by hearing, if you are hearing falsehoods- those falsehoods have the ability to block faith. It is apparent in the Bible, that God has chosen the manner of acting on belief prior to seeing the result. We have plenty of input all around us to interfere with that process. (March 30, 2014 at 12:47 pm)Bad Writer Wrote: Ah, but remember that god invented the rainbow to show Noah that he would never flood the earth again. Some people used to tie strings around their finger. Yahweh needed to fundamentally alter the way light interacts with water to remind himself not to slaughter the entire planet again.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too." ... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept "(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question" ... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist (March 30, 2014 at 7:41 am)tor Wrote: It's funny how there is absolutely nothing new in the god debate. Expected when there's nothing to study and nothing new to discover.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too." ... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept "(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question" ... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist (March 30, 2014 at 1:54 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: Expected when there's nothing to study and nothing new to discover. True, because the Judeo-Christian religions believe that their God is unchanging. If the deity remains the same, never-changing, then there will logically be nothing new to add on the atheist front. Atheists have already debunked the bible, seemingly the only book theists have to offer circular reasoning in claiming their beliefs to be non-fiction. The only new atheist arguments that arise are those in relation to apologists, and those arguments are too easy to dismiss because the theist cannot seem to think logically in relation to his religious beliefs.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)