Proving the Bible

[ThePinsir]

What's left besides God, I wish I could remember the evolutionist name that made this statement. We believe in evolution because if there is no evolution only one thing remains God.

GC

Proof?

[Minimalist]

What's left besides God, I wish I could remember the evolutionist name that made this statement. We believe in evolution because if there is no evolution only one thing remains God.

GC

I'll save you the time: nobody worth the time it would take to learn their name said that. Seriously, you can't possibly think that what you just said accurately reflects the state of things?

Sure he can. G-C is the king of the jesus freak idiots.

[Lemonvariable72]

What's left besides God, I wish I could remember the evolutionist name that made this statement. We believe in evolution because if there is no evolution only one thing remains God.

GC

How do you prove it was your god and not say vishnu?

[lordofgemini]

Whatever you call it Vishnu/magic/God/Allah. There has to be something that was eternal and absolute. That thing is called God. Who created everything out of nothing.

[RobbyPants]

For this quick post I just want to focus on people that tear down evolution to build up creation.
So let's say for the sake of argument evolution is blown Out of the water. Now prove Biblical creationism.

• Well, the universe had to have a first cause, so... Bible?
  
• We know watches are complex and have makers, and the universe is also complex, so... Bible?
  
• It's impossible to think about God if he doesn't exist, cuz I say so, so... Bible?
  
• Also, I read it in a book somewhere.
  

I think that's what counts for proof in some circles.

[Rampant.A.I.]

What's left besides God, I wish I could remember the evolutionist name that made this statement. We believe in evolution because if there is no evolution only one thing remains God.

GC

---

Whatever you call it Vishnu/magic/God/Allah. There has to be something that was eternal and absolute. That thing is called God. Who created everything out of nothing.

Wrong.

Causality did not exist prior to space time.

If there is an eternal cause, why must it be an entity?

If there is an eternal cause, why is it impossible the universe is eternal?

[Lemonvariable72]

Whatever you call it Vishnu/magic/God/Allah. There has to be something that was eternal and absolute. That thing is called God. Who created everything out of nothing.

If that's the case then why are all those belief systems mutuallly exclusive?

[The Valkyrie]

What's left besides God, I wish I could remember the evolutionist name that made this statement. We believe in evolution because if there is no evolution only one thing remains God.

GC

A statement of "We believe in evolution because if there was no evolution the only thing that remains is Odin AllFather" would have equal merit.

In other words, no merit whatsoever.

And, again, using the term "evolutionist" is fallacious and lazy.

---

Whatever you call it Vishnu/magic/God/Allah. There has to be something that was eternal and absolute. That thing is called God. Who created everything out of nothing.

Was does there have to be something eternal and absolute?

And, if there was, why do we have to call it "god"?

[lordofgemini]

Wrong.

Causality did not exist prior to space time.

If there is an eternal cause, why must it be an entity?

If there is an eternal cause, why is it impossible the universe is eternal?

Causality did not exist prior to space time? What's the basis of saying this and relevant proof. We take t=0 when space was created right. What about before that.

We are dealing with infinities. Something must be eternal and only that thing is eternal. Whatever that thing is it not an entity like Vishnu. With a face, feet and all because these are created things. That thing is not created. Its everywhere, its not subject to space or time. It beyond that. That thing is uncompareable and is not define able by any analogy.

I thought the big bang took place? Our that's what they taught me. Universe was created then no?

[Minimalist]

And, again, using the term "evolutionist" is fallacious and lazy.

Typical of the breed, though.