Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 22, 2025, 3:14 pm
Thread Rating:
Pro-life atheists
|
RE: Pro-life atheists
May 27, 2014 at 12:10 am
(This post was last modified: May 27, 2014 at 12:13 am by Chas.)
(May 27, 2014 at 12:06 am)Heywood Wrote:(May 26, 2014 at 11:53 pm)Losty Wrote: Not being able to survive on your own is not the same thing as not being able to survive if someone cuts you open and starts removing shit from your body that you need. Then there is no such thing as a viable organism above the single cell. Do you honestly think that anyone else accepts that as a correct definition of viable? You are just like the black knight in Monty Python and the Holy Grail.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method. RE: Pro-life atheists
May 27, 2014 at 12:12 am
(This post was last modified: May 27, 2014 at 12:53 am by Losty.)
(May 27, 2014 at 12:06 am)Heywood Wrote:(May 26, 2014 at 11:53 pm)Losty Wrote: Not being able to survive on your own is not the same thing as not being able to survive if someone cuts you open and starts removing shit from your body that you need. Grow up. No one is this stupid. You are intentionally being dishonest because you hate being wrong. (May 26, 2014 at 9:16 pm)Esquilax Wrote: *Heywood plugs his ears* nana nana I'm not listening Quote:..but that is just my whacked out conserve-tard opinion Possibly the first honest comment you've ever made, Woodie. (May 27, 2014 at 12:10 am)Chas Wrote:(May 27, 2014 at 12:06 am)Heywood Wrote: It is the same, You are dependent on other organism(s). You are not viable as an individual. The pro-abortion folks use a narrow definition in order to justify abortion. Viability, in the general sense, is not a good rationale to justify killing a human being....one obvious reason is because none of us are really viable. RE: Pro-life atheists
May 27, 2014 at 12:43 am
(This post was last modified: May 27, 2014 at 12:44 am by Chas.)
(May 27, 2014 at 12:36 am)Heywood Wrote:(May 27, 2014 at 12:10 am)Chas Wrote: Then there is no such thing as a viable organism above the single cell. You have backed yourself into a corner here, BlowJob. Be honest, admit you are wrong, and move on.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method. (May 27, 2014 at 12:36 am)Heywood Wrote:(May 27, 2014 at 12:10 am)Chas Wrote: Then there is no such thing as a viable organism above the single cell. Well....we are guilty of using the actual definition instead of making up our own, if that's what you mean. (May 27, 2014 at 12:43 am)Chas Wrote:(May 27, 2014 at 12:36 am)Heywood Wrote: The pro-abortion folks use a narrow definition in order to justify abortion. Viability, in the general sense, is not a good rationale to justify killing a human being....one obvious reason is because none of us are really viable. Wrong about what? Viability as a rationale to determine which human beings can be killed and which can't is nonsense. None of us are viable. RE: Pro-life atheists
May 27, 2014 at 12:51 am
(This post was last modified: May 27, 2014 at 12:52 am by Losty.)
(May 27, 2014 at 12:48 am)Heywood Wrote:(May 27, 2014 at 12:43 am)Chas Wrote: You have backed yourself into a corner here, BlowJob. It's getting a little pathetic Heywood. Be a grown up, admit that you're being dishonest about the definition of viability, and go back to one of your other ridiculous arguments. I for one quite enjoyed the whole abortion is never necesarry to save a woman's life because I don't believe that argument. RE: Pro-life atheists
May 27, 2014 at 12:52 am
(This post was last modified: May 27, 2014 at 12:56 am by Heywood.)
(May 27, 2014 at 12:47 am)Losty Wrote:(May 27, 2014 at 12:36 am)Heywood Wrote: The pro-abortion folks use a narrow definition in order to justify abortion. Viability, in the general sense, is not a good rationale to justify killing a human being....one obvious reason is because none of us are really viable. A time will come when a human being can be conceived and develop all the way into adulthood without the need of a mother. The notion of viability outside the womb is arbitrary and becoming more and more meaningless. (May 27, 2014 at 12:51 am)Losty Wrote: It's getting a little pathetic Heywood. Be a grown up, admit that you're being dishonest about the definition of viability, and go back to one of your other ridiculous arguments. I for one quite enjoyed the whole abortion is never necesarry to save a woman's life because I don't believe that argument. You still haven't provided one case where a late term abortion was the only option. That lady you says knows of cases but can't tell us because of patient privacy is BS argument. She doesn't need to tell us who the patient is/was.....all she needs to do is say this specific condition cannot be treated except via a late term abortion. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)