Posts: 591
Threads: 13
Joined: July 7, 2014
Reputation:
14
RE: Is Evolution a science or a faith?
July 27, 2014 at 3:48 pm
I'm noting you seem to think it's either evolution or god. This is a false dichotomy. Evolution is a fact. It has nothing to do with the existence or non existence of god. Most Christians have no issue with evolution, in fact the Catholic Church, which I came from, endorses it. It was not evolution which caused me to become an atheist, or to leave the church.
Evolution is a fact. It is observable, testable, verifiable.
Posts: 2610
Threads: 22
Joined: May 18, 2012
Reputation:
17
RE: Is Evolution a science or a faith?
July 27, 2014 at 5:36 pm
Both proponents for evolution and intelligent design use science to back up their faith in their own theories. Frankly, the people behind Ancient Aliens have more substance than what is passed as evolution these days.
But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin.
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: Is Evolution a science or a faith?
July 27, 2014 at 6:11 pm
Quote:This has been said countless times before on this forum, but Atheism is not the belief that there is no god, it is the lack of belief in a god.
And it never does seem to sink in with religious morons, does it?
Posts: 20476
Threads: 447
Joined: June 16, 2014
Reputation:
111
RE: Is Evolution a science or a faith?
July 27, 2014 at 6:17 pm
Gods? Ancient Aliens?
Can we please keep it "real"!
For a moment I thought I stumbled into the sci-fi channel.
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Posts: 3022
Threads: 34
Joined: May 11, 2013
Reputation:
30
RE: Is Evolution a science or a faith?
July 27, 2014 at 6:45 pm
(July 27, 2014 at 5:36 pm)Polaris Wrote: Both proponents for evolution and intelligent design use science to back up their faith in their own theories. Frankly, the people behind Ancient Aliens have more substance than what is passed as evolution these days.
Wow! Most ignorant forum member here! Everybody crowd round while we school this idiot.
1) You got one thing right, evolution uses science. From that point on you are wrong about everything.
Intelligent design (as anybody with the smallest amount of skepticism and intellectual honesty knows) is simply a cover for creationism. What they do is not science. They do not apply the scientific method at all. They start with an assumption and then look for evidence for it and ignore the evidence against. The theory of evolution was made by observing nature and following the evidence to where it pointed. IT twists the evidence to get what it wants. Anyone who believes IT uses science is an ignorant dolt.
2) Ancient aliens has more evidence than evolution? Are you trying to be as ignorant as possible? If you hadn't been here so long I would think you were a troll. Have you ever actually looked for the evidence of evolution? Ever bothered researching it? Ever bothered to understand the theory that you don't believe?
Well, let me tell you about the evidence.
DNA: The DNA evidence alone would be enough to prove evolution. All species share some DNA, we can tell which species are closely related to each other and which aren't. We can trace back genetic bottlenecks of species. We can tell exactly how we evolved to be more intelligent than our ape ancestors. And you have the arrogance to say that there isn't any evidence?
Fossil record: We can track the evolution of species through fossils. A snapshot in time, these fossils show us how many species evolved to be how they are today. Like the horse and the even toad undulates. We know that they have evolved to be marine, then terrestrial, then marine, then back to terrestrial. We can accurately predict what fossils we are going to find at different depths.
Biology: The composition of many living species all show evolution. One of my favorites is the laryngeal nerve. Its sole purpose is to control the voice box. However, it stretches from the base of the brain, loops around your aorta and then goes all the way back up to the larynx. Why could this be? Oh wait, we know why that is! Because millions and millions of years ago, our ancestors were fish-like creatures. They had no neck, which meant that the larngeal nerve didn't need to travel far at all. But then as our ancestors evolved, their bodies got longer but the laryngeal nerve had to stretch to carry out its function. This is exactly the kind of thing we would expect if a species evolved slowly over millions of years. Other examples include the sloth bear, which has lost its front teeth and the rest are very small as it has evolved to eat termites and ants. The tiger and the lion are very similar creatures to the point that they can actually breed and produce offspring, because they are incredibly closley related and share a common ancestor.
Go educate yourself you fool.
'The more I learn about people the more I like my dog'- Mark Twain
'You can have all the faith you want in spirits, and the afterlife, and heaven and hell, but when it comes to this world, don't be an idiot. Cause you can tell me you put your faith in God to put you through the day, but when it comes time to cross the road, I know you look both ways.' - Dr House
“Young earth creationism is essentially the position that all of modern science, 90% of living scientists and 98% of living biologists, all major university biology departments, every major science journal, the American Academy of Sciences, and every major science organization in the world, are all wrong regarding the origins and development of life….but one particular tribe of uneducated, bronze aged, goat herders got it exactly right.” - Chuck Easttom
"If my good friend Doctor Gasparri speaks badly of my mother, he can expect to get punched.....You cannot provoke. You cannot insult the faith of others. You cannot make fun of the faith of others. There is a limit." - Pope Francis on freedom of speech
Posts: 2610
Threads: 22
Joined: May 18, 2012
Reputation:
17
RE: Is Evolution a science or a faith?
July 27, 2014 at 7:06 pm
Too much drivel, stopped reading. If I wanted less unscientific BS than that, I'd go to a dive bar.
But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin.
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: Is Evolution a science or a faith?
July 27, 2014 at 7:07 pm
Polecat's beliefs guide his judgement. It's a problem with people like that.
Posts: 2610
Threads: 22
Joined: May 18, 2012
Reputation:
17
RE: Is Evolution a science or a faith?
July 27, 2014 at 7:09 pm
(This post was last modified: July 27, 2014 at 7:11 pm by Polaris.)
(July 27, 2014 at 7:07 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Polecat's beliefs guide his judgement. It's a problem with people like that.
The problem is people such as yourself who take things at face value without actually doing the research. I have a stronger backing in evolution than any of you. Like I know the flaws of the Bible (of which none of you have actually been able to mention), I also know the flaws concerning the assertions made to support evolution.
But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Is Evolution a science or a faith?
July 27, 2014 at 7:13 pm
Sounds fascinating. I'd like to see some of them.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 591
Threads: 13
Joined: July 7, 2014
Reputation:
14
RE: Is Evolution a science or a faith?
July 27, 2014 at 7:24 pm
(This post was last modified: July 27, 2014 at 7:25 pm by Natachan.)
The issues with the bible play no part in the evolution issue. The facts of evolution would be true if the bible we're completely false, or if some of the stories were based in facts.
|