Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 21, 2024, 10:37 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is “love” significant?
#21
RE: Is “love” significant?
(July 9, 2014 at 5:58 pm)XK9_Knight Wrote: And by the way, thank you Jenny for your clear and concise contribution to the discussion. But this last part intrigues me…

Jenny A Wrote:That said, the working of the brain is so complex that I can't say it feels like a bunch of chemical reactions. And I'll be damned if I going to behave as if it were.
(July 9, 2014 at 5:58 pm)XK9_Knight Wrote: What do you mean by that last part?

You mean damned? Undecided It's an expression. I've been know to say OMG too.

Or did you mean something deeper like, "what do mean by behaving as if weren't just chemical reactions?" Because there is a platform or framing problem with that statement isn't there? Thinking
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god.  If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.
Reply
#22
RE: Is “love” significant?
Love can be quite a selfish thing. Empathy doesn't have to be... though it can be amplified by love.
The gods offer no rewards for intellect. There was never one yet that showed any interest in it.
-- Mark Twain, Notebook
Reply
#23
RE: Is “love” significant?
(July 9, 2014 at 7:32 am)XK9_Knight Wrote: ... Sometimes I feel like my very presence here is a form of trolling (Lol). Honestly, I’m not “telling” you what love is, I’m asking. Significance is particular; I expected differing opinions and that’s what I asked for.

Sure, I could give my own opinion, but that’s no fun. I’m eager to hear from the rest of you. (And by the way, thanks all of you Tongue)
hmmmm I'm still waiting for the other shoe to drop. If you're still here a month from now, then I'll +1 rep and shower you in kudos. Tongue
Reply
#24
RE: Is “love” significant?
What's with you and shoes man? Stepped on as a child? Wink Shades
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#25
RE: Is “love” significant?
(July 9, 2014 at 7:10 pm)bennyboy Wrote:
(July 9, 2014 at 7:32 am)XK9_Knight Wrote: ... Sometimes I feel like my very presence here is a form of trolling (Lol). Honestly, I’m not “telling” you what love is, I’m asking. Significance is particular; I expected differing opinions and that’s what I asked for.

Sure, I could give my own opinion, but that’s no fun. I’m eager to hear from the rest of you. (And by the way, thanks all of you Tongue)
hmmmm I'm still waiting for the other shoe to drop. If you're still here a month from now, then I'll +1 rep and shower you in kudos. Tongue

@ bennyboy I don't think his shoes are big enough to hurt anyone.

@ XK9 Knight I am curious why you're here if you're worried it's trolling. I also think you probably ought to answer your own question, now that you've garnered some thoughtful answers.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god.  If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.
Reply
#26
RE: Is “love” significant?
(July 9, 2014 at 7:11 pm)Rhythm Wrote: What's with you and shoes man? Stepped on as a child? Wink Shades
No, I lived under a 1-legged man. It was very annoying.
Reply
#27
RE: Is “love” significant?
(July 8, 2014 at 8:40 pm)Chad32 Wrote: I think we do tend to put love on a higher pedestal than other emotions, and some people want to think there's some big divide between love and lust. Like love is this deep spiritual thing, while lust is a dirty perverted thing.

I definitely separate love and lust. I think they're both wonderful beautiful emotions but they're separate in that I feel love towards some people, and I feel lust towards others. Never both. Maybe it's just me.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
#28
RE: Is “love” significant?
(July 10, 2014 at 12:12 am)Losty Wrote:
(July 8, 2014 at 8:40 pm)Chad32 Wrote: I think we do tend to put love on a higher pedestal than other emotions, and some people want to think there's some big divide between love and lust. Like love is this deep spiritual thing, while lust is a dirty perverted thing.

I definitely separate love and lust. I think they're both wonderful beautiful emotions but they're separate in that I feel love towards some people, and I feel lust towards others. Never both. Maybe it's just me.
It's just you.
Reply
#29
RE: Is “love” significant?
The word love is just a pointer, the word means nothing, but what it points to means everything. Love is realizing your true self, its realizing that you and everyone else are one, we are all connected, and this connection when realized is pure love.
Reply
#30
RE: Is “love” significant?
By all logical standards, love is irrational. Despite knowing that, I enjoy being in love. Nothing else compares to loving someone and being loved in return by that same someone.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Thoughts on Courtly love (aka platonic love) Macoleco 16 1897 September 11, 2022 at 2:04 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Poll - 'Waiting for godot' a significant Philosophical Work? ManMachine 15 5084 January 21, 2015 at 11:41 pm
Last Post: Rev. Rye



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)